Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AddHarass Logical adjustment #452

Open
jzy-chitong56 opened this issue Nov 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

AddHarass Logical adjustment #452

jzy-chitong56 opened this issue Nov 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jzy-chitong56
Copy link
Contributor

In my understanding, the policy initialization will call init_strategy_XXX
At this point, the system will receive the unit type of this strategy -- AddHarass
It runs like this, right??

There is one place here that I think can be adjusted

We know that when AMAI is deployed according to strategy, the units type tend to be single, not a hybrid unit of traditional AI - of course, many players believe that hybrid or biased strong unit type of the current version will be stronger , And this is also one of the reasons why AMAI lost against some players' homemade AI in battles

When initializing a strategy, can usually assume that the required troops for the strategy have not yet formed a scale, or even a quantity of 0, and need to start from scratch
This means that triggering the harassment of this strategy may take a long time.

But as I mentioned earlier, when AMAI is deployed according to strategy, it tends to lean towards a single unit type, which means that the units type that were still alive in the previous strategy may not be necessary for this strategy. When harassing, priority should be given to units type that are not part of this strategy, such as the units from the previous strategy, in order to release useless units type

@SMUnlimited SMUnlimited added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants