You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What functionality will your new tokens add?
A new token might be added for requesting an offer from power or demanding an offer from power.
Describe the precise changes you'd like
Along with using existing tokens, we are proposing a new token ROF for requesting an offer or demand an offer by insistence.
Daide clauses for these two might be “SND (power power…) (PRP(ROF))” and “SND (power power…) (INS(ROF)) ” for Requesting and Demanding for offer respectively.
Example of request an offer – if any power is requesting Germany and Russia for an offer, the Daide clause might be “ SND (GER AUS) (PRP(ROF))”
Example of demanding an offer -if any power insisting or demanding Germany and Austria for an offer, the Daide clause might be “ SND (GER AUS) (INS(ROF))"
Additional context
For the negotiation between agents, we are proposing Daide extension.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Clarifications:
INS exists. ROF is a new proposal
During meeting it was discussed that either ROF could be used or a new functionality of the existing HOW (without arguments)
The idea of this proposal is to explicitly "pass the ball" back over to the other player to allow them to propose an offer of any type. What offer and how an agent would implement their response is open to interpretation.
What functionality will your new tokens add?
A new token might be added for requesting an offer from power or demanding an offer from power.
Describe the precise changes you'd like
Additional context
For the negotiation between agents, we are proposing Daide extension.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: