Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thanks for using xMIP/Coordination with xMIP #16

Open
jbusecke opened this issue Jul 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Thanks for using xMIP/Coordination with xMIP #16

jbusecke opened this issue Jul 26, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jbusecke
Copy link

jbusecke commented Jul 26, 2024

Hi,

just heard the great talk by @liellnima at the ML4ESM workshop, and was super excited to see that xMIP is used!

I wanted to reach out and see if there is any way I can help integrate xMIP better with ClimateSet.

I particular I noted this in the paper

The structure processor was implemented with xmip (Busecke and Abernathey, 2020) 
and follows their guidelines. Note that it is significantly slower than the CDO-implemented modules.

I am very curious to learn what causes the performance difference. Most of the corrections of xmip are applied lazily and should be quite cheap! If you have a minimal example that we could work through, it would be great to post an issue on the xmip issue tracker.

A small comment on the citation: It would be tremendous if you could update the citation to the actual software package doi:10.5281/zenodo.7519179 in the published paper. That would help me a lot in tracking useage and justify working on this software.

Again many thanks for using xMIP and please feel free to reach out with any questions/comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant