You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Either the documentation for Weights in lists is wrong, or they simply don't work. Testing using the discord bot
To test try making an extremely biased weight and a large number of outputs like the below:
/r command:20L[fail[99],pass[1]]
Despite one having 99 weight and one 1, the output will be an even mix of pass and fail. The readme is also very vague about this, I assume a higher number is a higher chance to happen, though since it doesn't work I can't really tell.
Workaround: Just repeat the item entirely and it's picked as an independent item, increasing its weight. But that's what I was trying to stop doing by using this feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Either the documentation for Weights in lists is wrong, or they simply don't work. Testing using the discord bot
To test try making an extremely biased weight and a large number of outputs like the below:
/r command:20L[fail[99],pass[1]]
Despite one having 99 weight and one 1, the output will be an even mix of pass and fail. The readme is also very vague about this, I assume a higher number is a higher chance to happen, though since it doesn't work I can't really tell.
Workaround: Just repeat the item entirely and it's picked as an independent item, increasing its weight. But that's what I was trying to stop doing by using this feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: