-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thuman2.0 evaluation is coming out differently #39
Comments
The issue was resolved after reprocessing the dataset using the new SMPL-X from THuman2.0. However, there is still a slight discrepancy in performance compared to the results reported in the SiFu paper. Could you help identify what might be causing this difference? When visualizing the 4-directional feature maps used in SiFu, I've noticed a difference between the feature maps generated with the provided pretrained weights and those generated with the weights from the model I trained. I'm not sure why this discrepancy occurs, and I would greatly appreciate your assistance in understanding the possible reasons. @River-Zhang This is the performance of the model I trained. |
Hello, I am training the model now, but I failed to process the human dataset, and I can't implement the processing process of ICON, can you share it |
Thank you for your great contribution to this paper.
I discovered that some data have a scale difference between the SMPLX normal map and the Thuman scan files during data preprocessing.
This seems to be affecting the evaluation. How should I resolve this?
Most of the data are correctly scaled, but there are some instances where the scales do not match.
I would appreciate any assistance you can provide. @River-Zhang
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: