You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, CollectionFieldInformer and MapFieldInformer``both have predicate on direct value containment (containingfor Collection,`containingKey`and`containingValue` for Map).
These query predicates are "nice" for literal values, but of little interest for managed values.
it would be far better to have Informer chaining in Collection/Map.
This could be achieved by adding the following predficates
Implementation should be able to return the most meaningfull Informer, based upon keys and values known types.
The main interest is that it could allow dynamic informers to benefit from these implementation, creating methods such as (for our beloved gaedo-test-beans)
Currently,
CollectionFieldInformer
and MapFieldInformer``both have predicate on direct value containment (containing
for Collection,`containingKey`and`containingValue` for Map).These query predicates are "nice" for literal values, but of little interest for managed values.
it would be far better to have Informer chaining in Collection/Map.
This could be achieved by adding the following predficates
and
Implementation should be able to return the most meaningfull Informer, based upon keys and values known types.
The main interest is that it could allow dynamic informers to benefit from these implementation, creating methods such as (for our beloved gaedo-test-beans)
quite engrish, no ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: