SuppressionFile.suppress

<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<NewDataSet>
  <xs:schema id="NewDataSet" xmlns="" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:msdata="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msdata">
    <xs:element name="NewDataSet" msdata:IsDataSet="true" msdata:UseCurrentLocale="true">
      <xs:complexType>
        <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
          <xs:element name="SuppressVersion">
            <xs:complexType>
              <xs:sequence>
                <xs:element name="CurrentVersion" type="xs:int" minOccurs="0" />
                <xs:element name="IsPrimary" type="xs:boolean" minOccurs="0" />
              </xs:sequence>
            </xs:complexType>
          </xs:element>
          <xs:element name="Detours" msdata:CaseSensitive="False">
            <xs:complexType>
              <xs:sequence>
                <xs:element name="FileName" type="xs:string" default="" />
                <xs:element name="ErrorCode" type="xs:string" default="" />
                <xs:element name="Message" type="xs:string" default="" />
                <xs:element name="CodePrev" type="xs:unsignedInt" default="0" />
                <xs:element name="CodeCurrent" type="xs:unsignedInt" default="0" />
                <xs:element name="CodeNext" type="xs:unsignedInt" default="0" />
              </xs:sequence>
            </xs:complexType>
          </xs:element>
        </xs:choice>
      </xs:complexType>
      <xs:unique name="Constraint1" msdata:PrimaryKey="true">
        <xs:selector xpath=".//Detours" />
        <xs:field xpath="FileName" />
        <xs:field xpath="ErrorCode" />
        <xs:field xpath="Message" />
        <xs:field xpath="CodePrev" />
        <xs:field xpath="CodeCurrent" />
        <xs:field xpath="CodeNext" />
      </xs:unique>
    </xs:element>
  </xs:schema>
  <SuppressVersion>
    <CurrentVersion>3</CurrentVersion>
    <IsPrimary>false</IsPrimary>
  </SuppressVersion>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1037</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two or more case-branches perform the same actions. Check lines: _, _</Message>
    <CodePrev>9087866</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>22499</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>9087854</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1037</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two or more case-branches perform the same actions. Check lines: _, _</Message>
    <CodePrev>284318</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>373959</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2337</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1037</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two or more case-branches perform the same actions. Check lines: _, _</Message>
    <CodePrev>568552</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1531219687</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2337</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1037</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two or more case-branches perform the same actions. Check lines: _, _, _</Message>
    <CodePrev>284188</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1531219815</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2337</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1037</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two or more case-branches perform the same actions. Check lines: _, _, _</Message>
    <CodePrev>284176</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1531219879</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2337</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1037</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two or more case-branches perform the same actions. Check lines: _, _, _</Message>
    <CodePrev>284214</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1531219879</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2337</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1037</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two or more case-branches perform the same actions. Check lines: _, _</Message>
    <CodePrev>568458</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1829909734</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2337</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1037</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two or more case-branches perform the same actions. Check lines: _, _, _</Message>
    <CodePrev>568423</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>2086950260</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2331398756</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1037</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two or more case-branches perform the same actions. Check lines: _, _</Message>
    <CodePrev>568556</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3062438247</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2337</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V513</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Use _beginthreadex/_endthreadex functions instead of CreateThread/ExitThread functions.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3147281295</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2048798809</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V616</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The '(RD_OPT_A)' named constant with the value of _ is used in the bitwise operation.</Message>
    <CodePrev>227</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3424005310</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>3168682899</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V616</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The '(RD_OPT_A)' named constant with the value of _ is used in the bitwise operation.</Message>
    <CodePrev>227</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3424005310</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>3731828376</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V720</ErrorCode>
    <Message>It is advised to utilize the 'SuspendThread' function only when developing a debugger (see documentation for details).</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3676679972</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>176909</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V720</ErrorCode>
    <Message>It is advised to utilize the 'SuspendThread' function only when developing a debugger (see documentation for details).</Message>
    <CodePrev>1723405808</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3752072768</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>17733</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V801</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Decreased performance. It is better to redefine the second function argument as a reference. Consider replacing 'const .. pmd' with 'const .. &amp;pmd'.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>564295918</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>49736095</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V802</ErrorCode>
    <Message>On _-bit platform, structure size can be reduced from _ to _ bytes by rearranging the fields according to their sizes in decreasing order.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>463190756</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>623829659</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V835</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Passing cheap-to-copy argument by reference may lead to decreased performance. To avoid this, pass the second argument by value.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1128594287</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>49736095</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1071</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Consider inspecting the 'ChangeProtection' function. The return value is not always used. Total calls: _, discarded results: _.</Message>
    <CodePrev>1118882184</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>380846899</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>576071145</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V802</ErrorCode>
    <Message>On _-bit platform, structure size can be reduced from _ to _ bytes by rearranging the fields according to their sizes in decreasing order.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1550727875</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>54873497</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V802</ErrorCode>
    <Message>On _-bit platform, structure size can be reduced from _ to _ bytes by rearranging the fields according to their sizes in decreasing order.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1907918976</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>225475</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>Detours.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V802</ErrorCode>
    <Message>On _-bit platform, structure size can be reduced from _ to _ bytes by rearranging the fields according to their sizes in decreasing order.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3815906779</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>14801337</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1003</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The macro 'DOCTEST_CMP_LT' is a dangerous expression. The parameters 'l', 'r' must be surrounded by parentheses.</Message>
    <CodePrev>9657174</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>9653586</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>19305536</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1003</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The macro 'DOCTEST_CMP_GT' is a dangerous expression. The parameters 'l', 'r' must be surrounded by parentheses.</Message>
    <CodePrev>19312700</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>9657174</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>9653586</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1003</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The macro 'DOCTEST_CMP_GE' is a dangerous expression. The parameters 'l', 'r' must be surrounded by parentheses.</Message>
    <CodePrev>9653586</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>19305536</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>19314760</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1003</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The macro 'DOCTEST_CMP_NE' is a dangerous expression. The parameters 'l', 'r' must be surrounded by parentheses.</Message>
    <CodePrev>19313740</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>19312700</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>9657174</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1003</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The macro 'DOCTEST_CMP_EQ' is a dangerous expression. The parameters 'l', 'r' must be surrounded by parentheses.</Message>
    <CodePrev>1748409920</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>19313740</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>19312700</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1003</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The macro 'DOCTEST_CMP_LE' is a dangerous expression. The parameters 'l', 'r' must be surrounded by parentheses.</Message>
    <CodePrev>19305536</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>19314760</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1748471616</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1003</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The macro 'DOCTEST_SET_ATTR' is a dangerous expression. The parameter 'x' must be surrounded by parentheses.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>890209813</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1068</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Do not define an unnamed namespace in a header file.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>39317</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>99707695</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1068</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Do not define an unnamed namespace in a header file.</Message>
    <CodePrev>13743498</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>39317</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>99707695</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1068</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Do not define an unnamed namespace in a header file.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>39317</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1096</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The 'execute' variable with static storage duration is declared inside the inline function with external linkage. This may lead to ODR violation.</Message>
    <CodePrev>2050698983</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>383079957</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>123</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1096</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The 'mutex' variable with static storage duration is declared inside the inline function with external linkage. This may lead to ODR violation.</Message>
    <CodePrev>2000613816</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>2050698983</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>383079957</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V506</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Pointer to local variable 'fstr' is stored outside the scope of this variable. Such a pointer will become invalid.</Message>
    <CodePrev>807987489</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>799351</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>3053</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V547</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The 'A = failed' expression is equivalent to the 'A = true' expression.</Message>
    <CodePrev>58720225</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1090287455</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>4110147717</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V547</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The 'A = failed' expression is equivalent to the 'A = true' expression.</Message>
    <CodePrev>58720225</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>2035750756</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1987617292</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V550</ErrorCode>
    <Message>An odd precise comparison: lhs != rhs. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) &gt; Epsilon.</Message>
    <CodePrev>427585793</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>191333569</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V550</ErrorCode>
    <Message>An odd precise comparison: lhs != rhs. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) &gt; Epsilon.</Message>
    <CodePrev>1265009857</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>427585793</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>191333569</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V550</ErrorCode>
    <Message>An odd precise comparison: lhs != rhs. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) &gt; Epsilon.</Message>
    <CodePrev>1484550401</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1265009857</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>427585793</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V550</ErrorCode>
    <Message>An odd precise comparison: lhs != rhs. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) &gt; Epsilon.</Message>
    <CodePrev>3949308649</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1484550401</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1265009857</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V550</ErrorCode>
    <Message>An odd precise comparison: lhs == rhs. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) &lt; Epsilon.</Message>
    <CodePrev>2021547817</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1801759465</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>4185808681</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V550</ErrorCode>
    <Message>An odd precise comparison: lhs == rhs. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) &lt; Epsilon.</Message>
    <CodePrev>1102602950</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>2021547817</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1801759465</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V550</ErrorCode>
    <Message>An odd precise comparison: lhs == rhs. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) &lt; Epsilon.</Message>
    <CodePrev>4185808681</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3949308649</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1484550401</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V550</ErrorCode>
    <Message>An odd precise comparison: lhs == rhs. It's probably better to use a comparison with defined precision: fabs(A - B) &lt; Epsilon.</Message>
    <CodePrev>1801759465</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>4185808681</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>3949308649</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V565</ErrorCode>
    <Message>An empty exception handler. Silent suppression of exceptions can hide the presence of bugs in source code during testing.</Message>
    <CodePrev>88117</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>163194920</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>3841436198</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V730</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Not all members of a class are initialized inside the compiler generated constructor. Consider inspecting: rand_seed, first, last, abort_after, subcase_filter_levels, success, ...</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>823533691</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>123</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V730</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Not all members of a class are initialized inside the constructor. Consider inspecting: hasLoggedCurrentTestStart, currentSubcaseLevel, tc.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1296176280</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>19933</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V730</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Not all members of a class are initialized inside the constructor. Consider inspecting: hasLoggedCurrentTestStart, currentSubcaseLevel, tc.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1389946749</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>181</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V730</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Not all members of a class are initialized inside the compiler generated constructor. Consider inspecting: numAssertsCurrentTest_atomic, numAssertsFailedCurrentTest_atomic, reachedLeaf, currentSubcaseDepth, shouldLogCurrentException.</Message>
    <CodePrev>3139210159</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>2472553044</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>123</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V769</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The 'forward' pointer in the 'forward + _' expression could be nullptr. In such case, resulting value will be senseless and it should not be used.</Message>
    <CodePrev>294121</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>2832149</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>125</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V802</ErrorCode>
    <Message>On _-bit platform, structure size can be reduced from _ to _ bytes by rearranging the fields according to their sizes in decreasing order.</Message>
    <CodePrev>691332512</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>123</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1265169577</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V803</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Decreased performance. In case 'it' is iterator it's more effective to use prefix form of increment. Replace iterator++ with ++iterator.</Message>
    <CodePrev>1072393746</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>191448801</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1200275344</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V813</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Decreased performance. The 'in' argument should probably be rendered as a constant reference.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>746588651</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V814</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Decreased performance. The 'strlen' function was called multiple times inside the body of a loop.</Message>
    <CodePrev>3032172372</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>171808529</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2482729497</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V814</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Decreased performance. The 'strlen' function was called multiple times inside the body of a loop.</Message>
    <CodePrev>403502981</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>2345769587</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>3411878691</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V818</ErrorCode>
    <Message>It is more efficient to use an initialization list 'm_type(type)' rather than an assignment operator.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>95048432</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>3398104676</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V820</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The 'strRes' variable is not used after copying. Copying can be replaced with move/swap for optimization.</Message>
    <CodePrev>990583116</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>2938745641</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>19163608</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>doctest.h</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V823</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Decreased performance. Object may be created in-place in the 'stack' container. Consider replacing methods: 'push_back' -&gt; 'emplace_back'.</Message>
    <CodePrev>45566041</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3700555407</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>44737</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1004</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The pointer was used unsafely after it was verified against nullptr. Check lines: _, _.</Message>
    <CodePrev>5886</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>807119500</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>100</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1004</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The pointer was used unsafely after it was verified against nullptr. Check lines: _, _.</Message>
    <CodePrev>13296</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>807250508</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>5886</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1048</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The 'unBegin' variable was assigned the same value.</Message>
    <CodePrev>743129</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3197191414</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>3213048611</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1048</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The 'unBegin' variable was assigned the same value.</Message>
    <CodePrev>2747366233</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3197191414</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1215532822</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1048</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The 'unBegin' variable was assigned the same value.</Message>
    <CodePrev>2747366233</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3197191414</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1762222859</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V1064</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The left operand of integer division is less than the right one. The result will always be zero.</Message>
    <CodePrev>241929</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1557574077</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2058888081</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V566</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The integer constant is converted to pointer. Possibly an error or a bad coding style: reinterpret_cast&lt; unsigned int * &gt; (_x_)</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>381039254</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>381071978</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V566</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The integer constant is converted to pointer. Possibly an error or a bad coding style: reinterpret_cast&lt; unsigned int * &gt; (_x_)</Message>
    <CodePrev>381039254</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>381071978</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>4050350976</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V566</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The integer constant is converted to pointer. Possibly an error or a bad coding style: reinterpret_cast&lt; unsigned int * &gt; (_x_)</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1814642854</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V566</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The integer constant is converted to pointer. Possibly an error or a bad coding style: reinterpret_cast&lt; unsigned int * &gt; (_x_)</Message>
    <CodePrev>4165284930</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>2139378968</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V566</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The integer constant is converted to pointer. Possibly an error or a bad coding style: reinterpret_cast&lt; void * &gt; (_x_)</Message>
    <CodePrev>1860045993</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3389638323</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V566</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The integer constant is converted to pointer. Possibly an error or a bad coding style: reinterpret_cast&lt; void * &gt; (_x_)</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>3389638323</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V566</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The integer constant is converted to pointer. Possibly an error or a bad coding style: reinterpret_cast&lt; unsigned int * &gt; (_x_)</Message>
    <CodePrev>381071978</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>4050350976</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V566</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The integer constant is converted to pointer. Possibly an error or a bad coding style: reinterpret_cast&lt; unsigned int * &gt; (_x_)</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>4165276732</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>4165284930</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V566</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The integer constant is converted to pointer. Possibly an error or a bad coding style: reinterpret_cast&lt; unsigned int * &gt; (_x_)</Message>
    <CodePrev>4165276732</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>4165284930</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>2139378968</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V599</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The virtual destructor is not present, although the 'BaseTestingRTTI' class contains virtual functions.</Message>
    <CodePrev>71443353</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1143534489</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>125</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V599</ErrorCode>
    <Message>The virtual destructor is not present, although the 'BaseTestingRTTI' class contains virtual functions.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1143534489</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>71443353</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V760</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Two identical blocks of text were found. The second block begins from line _.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>271169278</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V829</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Lifetime of the heap-allocated variable 'pMsg_' is limited to the current function's scope. Consider allocating it on the stack instead.</Message>
    <CodePrev>1017984259</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1017853859</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>0</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V829</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Lifetime of the heap-allocated variable 'pMsg_' is limited to the current function's scope. Consider allocating it on the stack instead.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1017853859</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>257456385</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V829</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Lifetime of the heap-allocated variable 'pMsg_' is limited to the current function's scope. Consider allocating it on the stack instead.</Message>
    <CodePrev>0</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1017984259</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>1017853859</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
  <Detours>
    <FileName>main.cpp</FileName>
    <ErrorCode>V829</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Lifetime of the heap-allocated variable 'pMsg_' is limited to the current function's scope. Consider allocating it on the stack instead.</Message>
    <CodePrev>1870392862</CodePrev>
    <CodeCurrent>1017984259</CodeCurrent>
    <CodeNext>257450241</CodeNext>
  </Detours>
</NewDataSet>