We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello,
shouldn't ValueStream<T>.map(U Function(T)) return ValueStream<U> instead of Stream<U>?
ValueStream<T>.map(U Function(T))
ValueStream<U>
Stream<U>
I'd like to have an easy way to map the value stream while preserving the value stream characteristics.
This is what I used instead: https://gist.github.com/Albert221/c0da244cec07f7f2de317d19d9a56a27
Probably related to #625.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hello,
shouldn't
ValueStream<T>.map(U Function(T))
returnValueStream<U>
instead ofStream<U>
?I'd like to have an easy way to map the value stream while preserving the value stream characteristics.
This is what I used instead: https://gist.github.com/Albert221/c0da244cec07f7f2de317d19d9a56a27
Probably related to #625.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: