-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
[QUESTION] how-to do prefix whitelisting #228
Comments
Hi I think the fastest way if you want that prefix to be marked as "valid", create and use static ROA. As I see you are using Juniper device which means you can create in this way:
And I think the static is more prefered, its worth a try. |
thanks @Methionyl for looking into it, but if that prefix is learnt from many locations is not the most convenient method to do so. |
anyone? can you please advise on how to use RIPE's RPKI validator to whitelist a ROA? what is going wrong above? |
Hi, I have tried to reproduce the situation above. I followed your steps (start validator, add whitelist entry, it is then present in slurm.json). I can not reproduce the situation. Could you:
What do I see?When I check the ROA export endpoint of the validator,
I see that the whitelisted prefix is present. This is the endpoint that is fetched by rtr server. When I look at the RTR server, I see that:
Its cache is valid. When I connected rtr-client to that rtr server instance:
I get the currently valid ROAs (over time, this is very good for keeping history) dumped into a file. When I grep in that that:
I see the whitelisted prefix. |
Hi,
If we consider as an example the following network RPKI invalid prefix
1.37.137.0/24
fromAS4775
.In the network
which agrees with the published ROAs
Now, taking advantage of the app's feature whitelisting
which updates
slurm.json
accordinglyIt has the following effect in the web app, now it is depicted as valid
But, almost 1h later the router still sees it as RPKI
invalid
Should I see the above entry in the logs on the
RTR
server ?(btw, it would help using grep on
prefix=
by decoding the prefix value, in which format it is encoded?)Would you be so kind to advise how I can achieve making
1.37.137.0/24
fromAS4775
seem asvalid
orunknown
?(when I don't own, I don't work in
AS4775
, but let's assume it is a customer of ours and temporarily I would like to whitelist that)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: