-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cluster labels when using a hard-coded prior #26
Comments
You ran the example locally and got a different result? The question is: are there reasons for this? |
Hi, thanks for the response! It is actually not a discrepancy between the vignette and the results I get locally. I am able to re-produce the vignette results exactly. However, when I check I've found the package to work quite well for the use cases you mentioned, however I'd like to try to incorporate prior information. Would you recommend against using any non-default prior at this time? Thanks in advance! |
I see. That sounds like a bug. It might be simple to resolve but it might not. I don't have a bioc dev environment available to me and I wouldn't be able to get to investigating it for some time. |
In the vignette section Using Priors, the$K = 2$ mixture components, but when you check
pfit2
object is supposed to havetable(pfit2@label)
you find that all observations are assigned to one cluster. However, according to the scatterplot ofpfit2
, there are 2 components. Is there are reason for the discrepancy?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: