refs.bib

@article{chamberlin1897,
  title = {The {{Method}} of {{Multiple Working Hypotheses}}},
  author = {Chamberlin, T.C.},
  year = {1897},
  journal = {The Journal of Geology},
  volume = {5},
  pages = {837--848},
  abstract = {With this method the dangers of parental affection for a favorite theory can be circumvented. by T. C. Chamberlin As methods of study constitute the leading theme of our session, I have chosen as a subject in measurable consonance the method of multiple working hypothesis in its application to investigation, instruction, and citizenship. There are two fundamental classes of study. The one consists in attempting to follow by close imitation the processes of previous thinkers, or to acquire by memorizing the results of their investigations. It is merely secondary, imitative, or acquisitive study. The other class is primary or creative study. In it the effort is to think independently, or at least individually, in the endeavor to discover new truth, or to make new combinations of truth, or at least to develop an individualized aggregation of truth. The endeavor is to think for one's self, whether the thinking lies wholly in the fields of previous thought or not. It is not necessary to this habit of study that the subject-material should be new; but the process of thought and its results must be individual and independent, not the mere following of previous lines of thought ending in predetermined results. The demonstration of a problem in Euclid precisely as laid down is an illustration of the former; the demonstration of the same proposition by a method of one's own or in a manner distinctively individual is an illustration of the latter; both lying entirely within the realm of the known and the old. Creative study, however, finds it largest application in those subjects in which, while much is known, more remains to be known. Such are the fields which we, as naturalists, cultivate; and we are gathered for the purpose of developing improved methods lying largely in the creative phase of study, though not wholly so. Intellectual methods have taken three phases in the history of progress thus far. What may be the evolutions of the future it may not be prudent to forecast. Naturally the methods we now urge seem the highest attainable. These three methods may be designated, first, the method of ruling theory; second, the method of working hypothesis; and, third, the method of multiple working hypothesis.}
}

@article{perkel2022,
  title = {Cut the Tyranny of Copy-and-Paste with These Coding Tools},
  author = {Perkel, Jeffrey M.},
  year = {2022},
  month = feb,
  journal = {Nature},
  volume = {603},
  number = {7899},
  pages = {191--192},
  publisher = {{Nature Publishing Group}},
  doi = {10.1038/d41586-022-00563-z},
  abstract = {`Executable manuscripts' insert results directly into documents, eliminating common mistakes.},
  copyright = {2022 Nature},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {Computational biology and bioinformatics,Computer science,Software},
  annotation = {Bandiera\_abtest: a Cg\_type: Technology Feature Subject\_term: Computational biology and bioinformatics, Computer science, Software},
  file = {C\:\\Users\\qasena\\Zotero\\storage\\25TL2YZE\\Perkel - 2022 - Cut the tyranny of copy-and-paste with these codin.pdf;C\:\\Users\\qasena\\Zotero\\storage\\42QNYGK9\\d41586-022-00563-z.html}
}