Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FInd a nice notation for reverse triple #58

Open
Tpt opened this issue Mar 1, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

FInd a nice notation for reverse triple #58

Tpt opened this issue Mar 1, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@Tpt
Copy link
Member

Tpt commented Mar 1, 2015

The current notation used in the UI is ugly.

@Ezibenroc
Copy link
Member

👍

@yhamoudi
Copy link
Member

yhamoudi commented Mar 1, 2015

Why this issue is opened here and not into the UI repository ?

@Tpt
Copy link
Member Author

Tpt commented Mar 1, 2015

Because the notation should be defined in the data model specification and
supported by the notation parser.

@Ezibenroc
Copy link
Member

I think we should display the predicate next to the inverse predicate, since they are highly related.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants