Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem with Interactive Mode for DoG Interest Point Detection #53

Open
jmmuncie opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Problem with Interactive Mode for DoG Interest Point Detection #53

jmmuncie opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jmmuncie
Copy link

jmmuncie commented Mar 6, 2024

Hi,

I recently updated from an older (0.11.5) to newer (3.2.7) version of multiview-reconstruction and noticed a pretty significant change in behavior in how interest points are displayed in the interactive detection mode for difference of gaussian. I've attached images showing the difference I see in the old vs. new implementation. After playing around, it seems like I ultimately get very similar numbers of interest points when the sigma and threshold are set to the same values, but only a (random?) subset of the detections seem to be displayed in the newer implementation. Is this the expected behavior? It makes it more difficult to assess when the parameters have been set to desired values.

Thanks in advance for the help!

old new
@mhdominguez
Copy link
Contributor

mhdominguez commented Mar 7, 2024

AFAIK this interacitve DoG issue has been around since commit 855ed15 or shortly after (early October 2022), immediately following multiview-reconstruction-0.11.5, when net.preibisch.legacy.segmentation.InteractiveDoG was abandoned for imglib2 based code.

Since the issue doesn't seem to affect the ultimate detections, I think it has gone unnoticed.

@mhdominguez
Copy link
Contributor

@StephanPreibisch this issue should be improved in #55. However, the behavior of interactive DoG is somewhat a matter of personal taste, and the pull request alters the plugin's behavior and may not please everyone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants