Replies: 1 comment
-
After looking more into this, I think we should change our approach. The below table (notebook) shows that our projections for SS with respect to taxable returns are unstable. I've starred the columns we target today.
I'd suggest we start by switching to taxable return targets (#4284 and #4285). Later on, we could include targets among all returns, but I think only after we impute a probability of filing taxes among tax units with zero net tax (#4286 - we don't need to impute an accurate probability ex ante, since the reweighting will determine it; it's more of a prior). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
For calibrating against SOI targets, we currently filter to tax units with nonzero state+federal income tax, and compare that to the value among
All returns
in SOI tables. I'm wondering how well this reflects the choices people make to file, and accordingly how well aligned these are.In particular, the Social Security targets made me curious about this. Publication 1304, Table 1.4 (2021) shows 31.3 million returns with Social Security benefits, of which 21.6 million are taxable returns, and 24.0 million returns have taxable Social Security benefits. I don't think 10 million Social Security beneficiaries receive refundable tax credits; they might just file taxes out of habit.
Calibrating to taxable returns could be a safer bet. Curious what you think @nikhilwoodruff @donboyd5 @martinholmer
FWIW, ChatGPT suggested these reasons people could file non-taxable returns (Claude said basically the same):
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions