You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We hit our limit for papertrail, which is at 50MB—we are projected to hit 168MB this month. We can petition for a better plan, or even spend the $84 per year, but the logs will be more useful if they are less crammed with stuff to ignore anyway.
Requirements
reach out to papertrail asking them to give us the 1GB plan for free
attempt to reduce repetitive information
tests (fig 1): can we have a shorter, simpler, "5 tests ran successfully" for the happy path? Of course, if things go wrong, we may want more detailed logs, so it's important not to destroy that
archives (fig 2): can we reduce the space taken up with something like "100 sources archived successfully" or otherwise truncate
fig 1
fig 2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context
We hit our limit for
papertrail
, which is at 50MB—we are projected to hit 168MB this month. We can petition for a better plan, or even spend the $84 per year, but the logs will be more useful if they are less crammed with stuff to ignore anyway.Requirements
fig 1
fig 2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: