Determine which data would be required for a report in Pittsburgh/Allegheny County

[josh-chamberlain]

Context

• Part of Analyzing and Improving Allegheny County data access #49
• Follows Find examples of good reports/studies about police/alternative/co-response effectiveness #50

This task

We will divide up the work so everyone works on 2 studies (we will need to add 1 to the list)

• Leave one comment which contains the information in text form; please don't submit a PDF yet! You can edit your comment over time.
• For each analysis entry in the table below, investigate which sources they used and make a little table:
  • What type of data is it? (Dispatch/Call for Service logs? Staff/budget? Reference our taxonomy, and include qualitative and quantitative data)
  • Capture a link to the original source if possible
  • What parts of the data are critical? For example, does incident data need to contain time / date / location?
  • How important is it, from 1 (low) to 3 (high)?
• How did they present the data effectively / ineffectively?
  • what do we think of the charts, graphs, maps?
  • are there any presentations which are particularly clear, unclear, or misleading?
• What kind of findings / analysis did they achieve with the data? For example, "analysis of how different demographics used police services" or "analysis of whether complaints rose or fell with alternative responses"
  • We don't need to know what the study found or claims; just the kinds of claims it makes.

Format your comment like this:

## Study 1 [link to study](https://link.com)

data type | link | critical parts | importance
-- | -- | -- | --
Arrest records | [source link](https://link.com) | Needs charge type | 2
other | rows | look | like | this

## Presentation:
Here are a few sentences about how I think it was presented.

## Findings made:
The study talks about the effectiveness of alternative responses on mental health.

The table will look like this:

data type	link	critical parts	importance
Arrest records	source link	Needs charge type	2

Collected links so far

place = the location of the program
response type = alternative, co-response, training
link = link to evidence about it, formatted like this: [description](https://link.com)
link type = about (documenting a system with basic info or stats) analysis (rigorously analyzing/studying a system in a paper)

place	response type	link	link type
Raleigh, NC	alternate	jamie bradaway blog post	about
Raleigh, NC	alternate	raleighnc.gov news	about
Raleigh, NC	alternative	dontcallthepolice	about
Eugene, OR	alternative	jamie bradaway blog	about
Eugene, OR	alternative	eugene-or.gov cahoots	about
Eugene, OR	alternative	CAHOOTS stats	about
New York, NY	alternative	https://mentalhealth.cityofnewyork.us/b-heard	about
New York, NY	alternative	https://mentalhealth.cityofnewyork.us/bheard-data	about
National	alternative	988 data	about
Denver, CO	alternative	denver.gov STAR program	about
Denver, CO	alternative	caring4denver STAR program	about
Denver, CO	alternative	NLC STAR analysis	about
Denver, CO	alternative	9news STAR analysis	about
Boston, MA	co-response	police.boston.gov partnerships	about
Boston, MA	co-response	OUP policing analysis	analysis
Portland, OR	alternative response	portland.gov BHU	about
Austin, TX	alternative response	austintexas.gov EMCOT	about
Multiple	alternative response	AJPH paper	analysis
Multiple	training	Koerner, Staller paper	analysis
Multiple	co-response	Uding, Moon, Lum	analysis
Multiple	alternative	RTI international study	analysis