Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Swagger 2.2.25 -> 2.2.26 #1432

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

Upgrade Swagger 2.2.25 -> 2.2.26 #1432

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
Swagger compile patch 2.2.25 -> 2.2.26

Release Notes

swagger-api/swagger-core (Swagger)

v2.2.26: Swagger-core 2.2.26 released!

Compare Source

  • fix CI (java17 module substitution) (#​4785)
  • refs #​4771 - schema resolution for container types and oas31 (#​4784)
  • refs-#​4760-Fix enum type annotations processing (#​4780)
  • Fix java record type use annotations support (#​4773)
  • fix findJsonValueType (#​4764)
  • refs-#​4737 add scanning for other OAS elements besides paths (#​4762)
  • bump jetty to 9.4.56.v20240826 (#​4758)
  • Update findJsonValueType method to provide better support for Jackson… (#​4756)
  • Implement Tests to check basic Java Record processing result (#​4749)

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picnic-DevPla-Bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade Swagger 2.2.25 -> 2.2.26 (#1432)

See:
- https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/releases/tag/v2.2.26
- https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/compare/v2.2.25...v2.2.26

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.20.0 milestone Nov 20, 2024
@rickie rickie merged commit 1668546 into master Nov 20, 2024
15 checks passed
@rickie rickie deleted the renovate/swagger-2.x branch November 20, 2024 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants