Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for fsaverage #613

Open
3 tasks
kahinimehta opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 4 comments
Open
3 tasks

Add support for fsaverage #613

kahinimehta opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kahinimehta
Copy link
Collaborator

kahinimehta commented Oct 27, 2022

  • Data with fsaverage CIFTI derivatives
  • Add fsaverage to allowed spaces
  • Run on the test data and debug from there
@tsalo tsalo added enhancement New feature or request and removed breaking-change PRs that change results or interfaces. labels Oct 27, 2022
@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Nov 4, 2022

The CIFTI connectivity workflow does not have any transforms implemented, so we would need the same transform resolution steps that the NIFTI workflow has in order to support any CIFTI spaces other than fsLR.

@tsalo tsalo changed the title [ENH] Add support for fsaverage Add support for fsaverage Nov 14, 2022
@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Nov 14, 2022

From BIDS:

The fsaverage is a dual template providing both volumetric and surface coordinates references. The volumetric template corresponds to a FreeSurfer variant of MNI305 space. The fsaverage atlas also defines a surface reference system (formerly described as fsaverage[3|4|5|6|sym]).

I am not sure what the MNI305 FreeSurfer variant is, unfortunately. I think we would need to be able to transform the atlases to this space.

@mattcieslak
Copy link
Contributor

I assumed the volumetric space was nlin6. But that's cifti :(

@kahinimehta kahinimehta removed their assignment Dec 8, 2022
@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Sep 28, 2024

This is related to #1076.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants