-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inheritence support in getPojoFields or another method #80
Comments
Closing issue as issue #79 has already been implemented. |
all that 79 does is make the map not necessary as the return type (can now just return the methods)...there still needs to be a way to get all inherited fields with getPojoFields in my opinion...can you please reopen? |
Thank you for your timely response, I'll open an issue specifically to get all inherited fields as a separate enhancement as this issue mentions that #79 makes it not necessary. |
it makes returning a map not necessary..the issue is still the issue |
See issue #101 please feel free to comment on that regarding enhancing the PojoClass to get all fields. |
I was surprised getPojoFields didn't return inherited fields. I've been using this helper method to get all fields, even those inherited.
The map is because i need the PojoClass to getClazz().getDeclaredField(PojoField.getName()) in order to get a handle to the getters and setters method (using method factory). This wouldn't be necessary if #79 was implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: