How would you like to receive feedback? For example, here are a few options I can think of: annotated pdf printout of the page, editing the page and creating a pull request, providing individual corrections here. Also, are you looking for feedback on structure/organization?

I can see a few structural changes that might be beneficial to make --- e.g., explain the contents of the page concisely at the start of overview, and create a "Workflow for parallelizing an existing program" section containing the contents of the itemized list currently in overview.

Thanks, Tim. If it works for you, please edit the page and create a pull request. I would love feedback on structure and organization as well. This page right now reflects our ability to migrate a doc from Cilk Plus to OpenCilk. With your feedback, I think we might start a bigger process of making our new documentation work as effectively as possible.

If you run into any issues installing your local instance of the website, please let me know.

Hi @timkaler, thank you for confirming that you can review this article. Please ignore my earlier comment about creating a pull request, and use Netlify CMS as we discussed. In order to follow the website contribution process, I just updated the title of this issue to be the URL of the page that you're reviewing.

Contrary to what I said during our team Zoom, you can edit an existing article with Netlify CMS, and the existing content will remain visible. Your proposed edits go into a new branch, which does not get merged into the main branch until you finally "publish" your edits.

Thank you for your contributions to OpenCilk.