We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The Avogadro implementation has "sets" as a nested object for orbital coefficients at each coordinate set (e.g., for following a reaction).
Right now, that does not include orbital energies which could also vary during a trajectory
Do we need to have varying orbital occupations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If those orbitals could be natural, then yes.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Makes sense - I'll work on that. Formalizing the schema will be the first start.
No branches or pull requests
The Avogadro implementation has "sets" as a nested object for orbital coefficients at each coordinate set (e.g., for following a reaction).
Right now, that does not include orbital energies which could also vary during a trajectory
Do we need to have varying orbital occupations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: