Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 2, 2024. It is now read-only.

Consider adding run-as-user concept #117

Closed
djhaynes opened this issue Aug 19, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

Consider adding run-as-user concept #117

djhaynes opened this issue Aug 19, 2013 · 5 comments

Comments

@djhaynes
Copy link
Contributor

As an output of the AI/OVAL Developer Days conversation (March 2011), it was
proposed that the OVAL System Characteristics file would benefit from some
construct that allowed the specification of the user that the scan was run as.

Outstanding questions that would need to be answered:

  1. Would this simply record the user at a file level, or at a more detailed
    level. (There are cases where an Interpreter would raise privileges during the
    scan, and should that information also get recorded?)
  2. Would use of AI be an appropriate implementation? Or something simpler?

Reference: Minutes from the Developer days conversation, available on the OVAL
web site.

http://oval.mitre.org/community/docs/OVAL_Spring_2011_Developer_Days_Minutes.pdf

@djhaynes
Copy link
Contributor Author

This item has been deferred from the Version 5.10 release.

@djhaynes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Recommend that this feature be prototyped using the xsd:any space within the
OVAL System Characteristics <system_info/> element. it is unclear that
the concept will apply to all tools. Some tools raise and lower their
privileges based upon needed access at run time. For this capability to be
useful it may need to reflect the privileges used when collecting each object.

@djhaynes
Copy link
Contributor Author

This has been moved to the OVAL Language Sandbox on GitHub.

OVALProject/Sandbox#95

@solind
Copy link

solind commented Sep 2, 2016

Note, XCCDF captures this information in the cdf12:identity element. Punting to 5.12.

@zport
Copy link

zport commented Jan 14, 2019

Issue moved to OVAL-Community/OVAL #55 via ZenHub

@zport zport closed this as completed Jan 14, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants