You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As part of the OBO Foundry principles, we aim to ensure that terms are included in the most appropriate ontology and avoid duplication across ontologies wherever possible. We are working on a biomarker ontology (BMONT) and have identified several terms related to clinical and diagnostic metrics that may align well with the scope of OPMI. Before proceeding to define these terms in our ontology, I wanted to reach out to ask if you would like to integrate any or all of the following terms into OPMI.
The terms are as follows:
therapeutic biomarker
pharmacodynamic biomarker
digital biomarker
We believe they could add value to OPMI if they are not already included.
Please let us know if you would like to incorporate any of these terms, or if you would prefer that we proceed with defining them in our own ontology. We are happy to collaborate and ensure these terms are defined in a way that aligns with OBO Foundry standards.
Thank you for considering our request. We look forward to hearing your thoughts and are open to any guidance you may have.
Best regards,
Astghik Sargsyan
Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing SCAI
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear OPMI Maintainers,
As part of the OBO Foundry principles, we aim to ensure that terms are included in the most appropriate ontology and avoid duplication across ontologies wherever possible. We are working on a biomarker ontology (BMONT) and have identified several terms related to clinical and diagnostic metrics that may align well with the scope of OPMI. Before proceeding to define these terms in our ontology, I wanted to reach out to ask if you would like to integrate any or all of the following terms into OPMI.
The terms are as follows:
We believe they could add value to OPMI if they are not already included.
Please let us know if you would like to incorporate any of these terms, or if you would prefer that we proceed with defining them in our own ontology. We are happy to collaborate and ensure these terms are defined in a way that aligns with OBO Foundry standards.
Thank you for considering our request. We look forward to hearing your thoughts and are open to any guidance you may have.
Best regards,
Astghik Sargsyan
Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing SCAI
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: