-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The parent class of 'host-microbiome interaction' #3
Comments
It's fine for me to define it as the subClass of INO:interaction. The definition of INO:interaction is too general: Can it be defined more specific? such as: A process that has two or more material entities (i.e., interactors) participated in and have an effect upon one another. |
Hi Jie,
Thanks for your comment. I think INO:interaction wants to be general so that the interactor can be more than a material entity. For example, a process (like infection) can also be an interactor. However, we may generate one subclass under it called biological interaction and then make it to be a better parent class of OHMI:HMI. What do you think?
Best,
Oliver
From: jie zheng <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 3:35 PM
To: OHMI-ontology/OHMI <[email protected]>
Cc: He, Oliver <[email protected]>; Author <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OHMI-ontology/OHMI] The parent class of 'host-microbiome interaction' (#3)
External Email - Use Caution
It's fine for me to define it as the subClass of INO:interaction.
The definition of INO:interaction is too general:
Interaction is a processual entity that has two or more participants (i.e., interactors) that have an effect upon one another.
Can it be defined more specific? such as: A process that has two or more material entities (i.e., interactors) participated in and have an effect upon one another.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#3?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABD22Q2U5AZ2YCWL3NVDN63QI7ZEZA5CNFSM4IVBESSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD6MHYOY#issuecomment-530086971>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABD22Q2Q6FCGASAUKL7KDY3QI7ZEZANCNFSM4IVBESSA>.
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
|
@yongqunh Not sure about it. Please check IDO:infection http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IDO_0000586 which is a material entity. |
In OHMI, we currently assert 'host-microbiome interaction' as a subclass of GO 'interaction with host'. However, this assertion is not a good fit because the term 'host-microbiome interaction' focuses on two organisms rather than a host organism and a collection of microorganisms which is needed for the host-microbiome interaction.
I have submitted a track issue to GO:
geneontology/go-ontology#17812
Another option is to assert it as a subclass of INO:interaction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: