You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Splitting out from #3509 so I can close that massive issue, in a recent(ish) TDC call, we agreed to the following (leaving out points that I already did the day of the call):
For now, use review to bring issues to the TSC's attention for decision on whether to implement or not - in particular, if we aren't going to do something, we should close it
@baywet noted that for things that are approved, a help wanted label is a common practice
@karenetheridge mentioned some other options in additon to (or instead of?) the review, specifically triage and discussion-needed
handrews
changed the title
Define and add new process labels and document general label usage in DEVELOPMENT.md
Define and add new process labels and document general label usage in CONTRIBUTING.md
Oct 22, 2024
Splitting out from #3509 so I can close that massive issue, in a recent(ish) TDC call, we agreed to the following (leaving out points that I already did the day of the call):
review
to bring issues to the TSC's attention for decision on whether to implement or not - in particular, if we aren't going to do something, we should close ithelp wanted
label is a common practicereview
, specificallytriage
anddiscussion-needed
@lornajane commented:
This issue tracks that so it's not buried iin the mega-label-refactor issue, which can now be closed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: