Work in progress! Each section links to issues that are relevant to fill out the rest of this document.
We are currently working on defining and documenting our new processes. Information in this document is up-to-date. Older (and sometimes now inaccurate) documentation can be found in DEVELOPMENT.md, which will be removed when everything is updated and documented here.
This section serves as a quick guide while we work on the full updated documentation.
If in doubt about a policy, please ask on our Slack before opening a PR.
No changes, no matter how trivial, are ever made to the contents of published specifications. The only potential changes to those documents are updates to link URLs if and only if the targeted document is moved by a 3rd party. Other changes to link URLs are not allowed.
The spec site is the source of truth.
This changed in 2024, as the markdown files on main
do not include certain credits and citations.
As of October 2024 (post-OAS 3.0.4 and 3.1.1), the OAS is developed in the src/oas.md
file on minor release vX.Y-dev
branches that are derived from the baseline dev
branch.
Schema changes are made on the same branch, but can be released independently. When making a specification change for a new minor or major release that has a schema impact, including the schema change in the PR is preferred. Patch releases cannot contain changes that require a schema update.
main
is used to publish finished work and hold the authoritative versions of general documentation such as this document, which can be merged out to other branches as needed. Thesrc
tree is not present onmain
.dev
is the primary branch for working with thesrc
tree, which is kept up-to-date with the most recent release on the most recent minor (X.Y) release line, and serves as the base for each new minor release line. Development infrastructure that is not needed onmain
is maintained here, and can be merged out to other non-main
branches as needed.vX.Y-dev
is the minor release line development branch for X.Y, including both the initial X.Y.0 minor version and all subsequent X.Y.Z patch versions. All PRs are made to oldest activevX.Y-dev
branch to which the change is relevant, and then merged forward as shown in the diagram further down in this document.vX.Y.Z-rel
is the release branch for an X.Y.Z release (including when Z == 0). It exists primarily forgit mv
-ingsrc/oas.md
to the appropriateversions/X.Y.Z.md
location before merging back tomain
, and can also be used for any emergency post-release fixes that come up, such as when a 3rd party changes URLs in a way that breaks published links.
All work MUST be done on a fork, using a branch from the earliest relevant and active vX.Y-dev
branch, and then submitted as a PR to that vX.Y-dev
branch.
For example, if a change in November 2024 apples to both 3.1 and 3.2, the PR would go to the v3.1-dev
branch, which will be merged up to v3.2-dev
before the next 3.2 release.
The specification and schemas are published to the spec site by creating an vX.Y.Z-rel
branch where src/oas.md
is renamed to the appropriate versions/X.Y.Z.md
file and then merged to main
. The HTML versions of the OAS are automatically generated from the versions
directory on main
. This renaming on the vX.Y.Z-rel
branch preserves the commit history for the published file on main
when using git log --follow
(as is the case for all older published files).
The publishing process for schemas is still under discussion (see issues #3715 and #3716), with the current proposal being to release them directly from the vX.Y-dev
branch without merging to main
, as the schemas in source control have placeholder identifiers and are not intended to be used as-is.
For information on the branch and release strategy for OAS 3.0.4 and 3.1.1 and earlier, see the comments in issue #3677.
Upon release:
- Pre-release steps:
- The most recent published patch release from the previoius line is merged up to
vX.Y-dev
, if relevant - If doing simultaneous releases on multiple lines, do them from the oldest to newest line
- If the release is the most recent on the current line, merge
vX.Y-dev
todev
- For example, if releasing 3.1.3 and 3.2.0:
- release 3.1.3 first, including merging
v3.1-dev
todev
as 3.1 is current at that moment - release 3.2.0 second, also merging
v3.2-dev
todev
as 3.2 becomes current at that point - any subsequent 3.1.4 would not trigger a merge of
v3.1-dev
todev
, as 3.1 would no longer be current
- release 3.1.3 first, including merging
- The most recent published patch release from the previoius line is merged up to
- Release branching and merging:
- branch
vX.Y.Z-rel
fromvX.Y-dev
(same commit that was merged todev
if relevant) - After renaming
src/oas.md
toversions/X.Y.Z.md
, mergevX.Y.Z-rel
tomain
- branch
- Publishing to the spec site is triggered by the merge to
main
- Post-release steps:
- If this was a major or minor release (Z == 0), branch
vX.Y+1-dev
fromdev
, from the commit wherevX.Y-dev
was merged todev
- If this was a major or minor release (Z == 0), branch
Release lines are grouped by color, although the colors of dev
and main
are not significant as these diagrams are limited to only 8 colors.
---
config:
themeVariables:
git0: "#5588bb"
git1: "#cc8899"
git2: "#eedd88"
git3: "#ccbb66"
git4: "#aa9944"
git5: "#887722"
git6: "#99ccff"
git7: "#77aadd"
gitBranchLabel1: "#000000"
gitBranchLabel2: "#000000"
gitBranchLabel3: "#000000"
gitBranchLabel4: "#000000"
gitBranchLabel5: "#ffffff"
gitBranchLabel6: "#000000"
gitBranchLabel7: "#000000"
---
gitGraph TB:
commit id:"merge 3.1.1.md to main" tag:"3.1.1"
branch dev order:1
commit id:"rename 3.1.1.md to src/oas.md"
branch v3.1-dev order:2
commit id:"update version in src/oas.md to 3.1.2"
checkout dev
branch v3.2-dev order:6
commit id:"update version in src/oas.md to 3.2.0"
commit id:"some 3.2.0 work"
checkout v3.1-dev
commit id:"a 3.1.x fix"
checkout v3.2-dev
merge v3.1-dev id:"merge 3.1.2 fixes"
checkout v3.1-dev
branch v3.1.2-rel order:3
commit id:"rename src/oas.md to versions/3.1.2.md"
checkout dev
merge v3.1-dev id:"update dev with active line patch release"
checkout main
merge v3.1.2-rel tag:"3.1.2"
checkout v3.2-dev
commit id:"more 3.2.0 work"
checkout v3.1-dev
commit id:"update version in src/oas.md to 3.1.3"
commit id:"another 3.1.x fix"
checkout v3.2-dev
commit id:"still more 3.2.0 work"
merge v3.1-dev id:"merge 3.1.3 fixes before releasing"
checkout dev
merge v3.1-dev id:"update dev with last pre-minor release patch release"
merge v3.2-dev id:"update dev with minor release"
checkout v3.1-dev
branch v3.1.3-rel order:4
commit id:"rename src/oas.md to versions/3.1.3.md"
checkout v3.2-dev
branch v3.2.0-rel order:7
commit id:"rename src/oas.md to versions/3.2.0.md"
checkout main
merge v3.1.3-rel tag:"3.1.3"
merge v3.2.0-rel tag:"3.2.0"
checkout dev
branch v3.3-dev order:9
checkout v3.1-dev
commit id:"update version in src/oas.md to 3.1.4"
checkout v3.2-dev
commit id:"update version in src/oas.md to 3.2.1"
checkout v3.3-dev
commit id:"update version in src/oas.md to 3.3.0"
checkout v3.1-dev
commit id:"a 3.1.4 fix"
checkout v3.2-dev
commit id:"a 3.2.1 fix"
merge v3.1-dev id:"merge 3.1.4 fixes before releasing"
checkout v3.3-dev
merge v3.2-dev id:"merge 3.1.4 / 3.2.1 fixes"
checkout dev
merge v3.2-dev id:"merge patch from active release line"
checkout v3.1-dev
branch v3.1.4-rel order:5
commit id:"rename src/oas.md to versions/3.1.4.md"
checkout v3.2-dev
branch v3.2.1-rel order:8
commit id:"rename src/oas.md to versions/3.2.1.md"
checkout main
merge v3.1.4-rel tag:"3.1.4"
merge v3.2.1-rel tag:"3.2.1"
checkout v3.2-dev
commit id:"update version in src/oas.md to 3.2.2"
checkout v3.3-dev
commit id:"3.3 work"
The first PR for a change should be against the oldest release line to which it applies. Changes can then be forward-ported as appropriate.
The specification under development is src/oas.md
, which only exists on development branches, not on main
.
The current (20 October 2024) active specification releases are:
Version | Branch | Notes |
---|---|---|
3.1.2 | v3.1-dev |
active patch release line |
3.2.0 | v3.2-dev |
minor release in development |
4.0.0 | OAI/sig-moonwalk | discussions only |
Contributions to this repository should follow the style guide as described in this section.
Markdown files in this project should follow the style enforced by the markdownlint tool,
as configured by the .markdownlint.yaml
file in the root of the project.
The markdownlint
tool can also fix formatting, which can save time with tables in particular.
The following additional rules should be followed but currently are not enforced by tooling:
- The first mention of a normative reference or an OAS-defined Object in a (sub)*section is a link, additional mentions are not.
- OAS-defined Objects such as Schema Objects are written in this style, and are not monospaced.
- Use "example" instead of "sample" - this spec is not about statistics.
- Use "OpenAPI Object" instead of "root".
- Fixed fields are monospaced.
- Field values are monospaced in JSON notation:
true
,false
,null
,"header"
(with double-quotes around string values). - A combination of fixed field name with example value uses JS notation:
in: "header"
, combining rules 5 and 6. - An exception to 5-7 is colloquial use, for example "values of type
array
orobject
" - "type" is not monospaced, so the monospaced values aren't enclosed in double quotes. - Use Oxford commas, avoid Shatner commas.
- Use
<span id="thing"></span>
for link anchors. The<a name="thing"></a>
format has been deprecated. - Headings use title case and are followed by a blank line.
Plus some suggestions, rather than rules:
- Use one sentence per line in paragraphs and bullet points, to make diffs and edits easier to compare and understand. A blank line is needed to cause a paragraph break in Markdown.
- In examples, use realistic values rather than foo/bar.
- JSON Schema keywords -> "keyword"
- OpenAPI fixed fields -> "field"
- property of a "plain" JSON object that is not an OpenAPI-defined Foo Object -> "property"
- "attribute" is only used in the XML context and means "XML attribute"
This section relates to the 3.x versions only.
Our roadmap for 3.x releases is community-driven, meaning the specification is open for proposed additions by anyone (see Proposals for Specification Changes), in addition to the issues already on the project backlog.
Changes in minor releases (such as 3.2, 3.3) meet the following criteria:
- Are backwards-compatible and be reasonably easy to implement in tooling that already supports the previous minor version. For example, new optional fields can be added.
- Drive quality-of-life improvements to support how OpenAPI is used by practitioners, so that OpenAPI evolves to continue to meet user needs.
For example, adding fields to support changes in other standards, or adopting common
x-*
extension fields into the specification. - Bring the future closer by making changes that are in line with future 3.x releases and the planned OpenAPI 4.x (Moonwalk) specification as the details of that become available.
- Make the specification document clearer or easier to understand.
A minor release is due when there are some meaningful features (including one or a small number of headline features).
Patch releases reflect a constant quest for improving the active minor versions of OpenAPI. Since we do not edit specification documents after publication, even the smallest change has to be in a new release.
Changes in patch releases meet the following criteria:
- Editorial changes such as spelling or formatting fixes, including link updates.
- Clarifications or additions that do not change the meaning of the specification.
Patch releases are created as often as there are changes to the specification worth releasing.
As an organisation, we're open to changes, and these can be proposed by anyone. The specification is very widely adopted, and there is an appropriately high bar for wide appeal and due scrutiny as a result. We do not accept changes lightly (but we will consider any that we can).
Small changes are welcome as pull requests.
Bigger changes require a more formal process.
-
Start a discussion of type "Enhancements". The discussion entry must include some use cases, your proposed solution and the alternatives you have considered. If there is engagement and support for the proposal over time, then it can be considered as a candidate to move to the next stage.
-
It really helps to see the proposed change in action. Start using it as a
x-*
extension if that's appropriate, or try to bring other evidence of your proposed solution being adopted. -
If you are adding support for something from another specification (such as OAuth), please point to implementations of that specification so that we can understand how, and to what degree, it is being used.
-
If the suggested change has good support, you will be asked to create a formal proposal. Use the template in the proposals directory, copy it to a new file, and complete it. Once you the document is ready, open a pull request on the main branch.
-
The proposal will be more closely reviewed and commented on or amended until it is either rejected or accepted. At that point, the proposal is merged into the
main
branch and a pull request is opened to add the feature to the appropriatedev
version of the specification.
Questions are welcome on the process at any time. Use the discussions feature or find us in Slack.
- Issue #3847: Document milestone usage in DEVELOPMENT.md
- Issue #3848: Define and add new process labels and document general label usage in DEVELOPMENT.md
- Issue #3582: TOB info needs to be updated
- Issue #3523: Define triage role criteria and process
- Issue #3524: Define the maintainer role criteria and process
The OpenAPI Initiative uses GitHub Projects to manage work outside of the specification development process. There are currently two active projects:
We are beginning (as of mid-2024) to use GitHub discussions for open-ended topics such as major enhancements.
As of mid-2024, we prefer to use issues for topics that have a clear associated action. However, many existing issues are more open-ended, as they predate GitHub's discussions features.
In an effort to keep the list of issues up to date and easier to navigate through, issues get closed automatically when they become inactive.
This process makes use of the following labels:
Needs author feedback
: the issue has been replied to by the triage team and is awaiting a follow up from the issue's author. This label needs to be added manually by people doing triage/experts whenever they reply. It's removed automatically by the workflow.No recent activity
: the issue hasn't received a reply from its author within the last 10 days sinceNeeds author feedback
was added and will be closed within 28 days if the author doesn't follow up. This label is added/removed automatically by the workflow.Needs attention
: The issue's author has replied since theNeeds author feedback
label was set and the triage team will reply as soon as possible. This label needs to be removed manually by people doing triage/experts whenever they reply. It's added automatically by the workflow.
An issue is opened every week, 7 days in advance, for the Technical Developer Community (TDC), it provides the information to connect the meeting, and serves as a placeholder to build the agenda for the meeting. Anyone is welcome to attend the meeting, or to add items to the agenda as long as they plan on attending to present the item. These issues are also automatically pinned for visibility and labeled with "Housekeeping".
Ten (10) days after the meeting date is passed (date in the title of the issue), it gets closed and unpinned automatically.