-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 252
Centrally managing NuGet packages
Status | PM |
---|---|
Incubation | Anand Gaurav |
As Noah, a developer who uses NuGet in an enterprise,
- I would like to manage all the package versions centrally at a repo level so that they do not go out of sync in the various projects in the repo.
- I can specify a range or float to latest version of a given package so that all projects in the repo always gets the latest available version when desired.
- I can lock down the package graph for the repo so that my builds are repeatable
- I can lock down direct and transitive dependencies so that the build behavior does not change by resolving to a different version of a package due to the locked version unavailability.
- I am able to lock down the integrity of the package so that so that the build behavior does not change by resolving to a different package with same ID+version
- I am able to lock the floating versions of packages to their respective resolved versions unless I explicitly ask the package to resolve to latest version.
- When I modify a common project that's a dependency of multiple projects in the repo, I should not be required to multiple checkins corresponding to each of the dependent projects.
- E.g. Project A->B->C->D->...->X. If I change the
PackageReference
for X, I should be making limited changes related to only Project X and not multiple changes for each of the projects that depend on it. (This would be case with per project lock file).
- E.g. Project A->B->C->D->...->X. If I change the
Extensibility requirements:
- I am able to define a different set of packages and versions for a specific project in the repo that differs from the centrally managed packages+versions.
- Correspondingly, I am able to lock down a different package graph for a specific project.
- (?) I am able to define package versions based on conditions.
- Correspondingly, I am able to lock down different graphs based on these conditions.
PackageReference requirements summary | Epic issue #6763
Enterprise customers with huge code-base spanning 100s of projects.
- Developers need this and have worked their way around in multiple ways. Some define the package version as a variable and then define all the version variables in a central file to control this behavior. E.g.
<PackageReference Include="My.Sample.Lib" Version="$(MySampleLibVersion)" />
- MSBuild team has built an SDK project to implement this behavior: Microsoft.Build.CentralPackageVersions. This spec has taken inspiration from this.
- Package Versions can be centrally managed in
packages.props
file located at the repo root. - Package references (
PackageReference
) managed at each project level without any version information. - Managing packages:
- Adding packages references not listed in
packages.props
will be an error by default. An option to updatepackages.props
file as part of adding the package reference will be available. - Updating package reference per project will be an error. An option to update in the
packages.props
file will be available. - Removing/uninstalling package references per project is allowed. There will be an option to do the same in the
packages.props
file.
- Adding packages references not listed in
- All the referenced packages and their transitive dependencies are locked in a lock file -
packages.lock.json
present at the level (same folder) as thepackages.props
file.- NuGet
restore
action, by default, will always resolve the dependencies using the lock file.- It will check if a referenced package (
PackageReference
in the project file) is already present in thepackages.props
file as well as thepackages.lock,json
file. If not, it errors out. - It will check if the version specified in
packages.props
match withpackages.lock.json
. If not, it errors out.
- It will check if a referenced package (
- NuGet
restore -update-lock-file
action will be able to recompute dependencies and overwrite the lock file. A similar experience on VS will be available.
- NuGet
To get started, you will need to create an MSBuild props file at the root of the solution/repo named Packages.props
that declares Package
items.
In this example, packages like Newtonsoft.Json
are set to exactly version 10.0.1
. All projects that reference this package will be locked to that version. If someone attempts to specify a version in a project they will encounter a build error.
Packages.props
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<ItemGroup>
<!-- Implicit Package References -->
<Package Include="Microsoft.NETCore.App" Version="[2.0.5]" />
<Package Include="NETStandard.Library" Version="[1.6.1]" />
<Package Include="Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk" Version="[15.5.0]" />
<Package Include="MSTest.TestAdapter" Version="[1.1.18]" />
<Package Include="MSTest.TestFramework" Version="[1.1.18]" />
<Package Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="[10.0.1]" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
SampleProject.csproj
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
Each project still has a PackageReference
but must not specify a version. This ensures that the correct packages are referenced for each project.
Some packages should be referenced by all projects in your tree. This includes packages that do versioning, extend your build, or do any other function that is needed repository-wide.
Packages.props
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<ItemGroup>
<Package Include="Nerdbank.GitVersioning" Version="[2.1.16]" PrivateAssets="All" />
<PackageReference Include="Nerdbank.GitVersioning" Condition=" '$(EnableGitVersioning)' != 'false' " />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
Nerdbank.GitVersioning
will be a package reference for all projects. A property EnableGitVersioning
has been added for individual projects to disable the reference if necessary.
If a user attempts to add a version to a project, they will get a build error:
The package reference 'Newtonsoft.Json' should not specify a version. Please specify the version in 'C:\repo\Packages.props'.
If a user attempts to add a package that does not specify a version in Packages.props
, they will get a build error:
The package reference 'Newtonsoft.Json' must have a version defined in 'C:\repo\Packages.props'.
Setting the following properties control how Traversal works.
Property | Description |
---|---|
CentralPackagesFile |
The full path to the file containing your package versions. Defaults to Packages.props at the root of your repository. |
Example
Use a custom file name for your project that defines package versions.
<Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<PropertyGroup>
<CentralPackagesFile>$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)MyPackageVersions.props</CentralPackagesFile>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
Existing projects will have versions in their project files. There are two approaches for these projects to make use of the CentralPackagesFile
:
TBD.
Additionally generate the CentralPackagesFile
to get started.
TBD.
>
TBD.
TBD.
To enable just put a packages.props
file in the solution root or repo root directory that is evaluated by msbuild.exe
during build. Additionally you can specify CentralPackagesFile
property indicating where to look for this file. The same will enable the feature.
How do I have a given set of package versions for all the projects but a different set for a specific package?
To override the global packages' version constraints for a specific project, you can define packages.props
file in the project root directory. This will override the global settings from the global/repo-level packages.props
file.
You can also specify CentralPackagesFile
property indicating where to look for this file for a given project in the project file or in the directory.build.props
file that gets evaluated for a given project.
In order to remove any confusion, the packages.props
or the CentralPackagesFile
specification nearest to the project will override all others. At a time only one packages.props
file is evaluated for a given project.
E.g. in the below scenario
Repo
|-- packages.props
|-- foobar.packages.props
|-- Solution1
|-- packages.props
|-- Project1
|-- Project2
|-- packages.props
|-- Project3
|-- directory.build.props // specifies CentralPackagesFile = path to foobar.packages.props
|-- Solution2
|-- Project4
In the above scenario:
- Project1 will refer to only
Repo\Solution1\packages.props
- Project2 will refer to only
Repo\Solution1\Project2\packages.props
- Project3 will refer to only
Repo\foobar.packages.props
- Project4 will refer to only
Repo\packages.props
Check out the proposals in the accepted
& proposed
folders on the repository, and active PRs for proposals being discussed today.