Provide a view of member's tool induction status for admin purposes

[alex-wells]

It's been suggested that it may be useful for teams responsible for tool maintenance/inductions to have access to the list of inducted members for those tools; it should be a fairly trivial matter to add a view that renders the contents of the tl_members_tools table for individual tools that is accessible only to the inductors, maintainers for that tool and the admins/membership team.

Thoughts?

[daniel1111]

I think this is a very good idea. It might also be nice to allow maintainers/admins to promote inducted members to inductor and/or maintainer in the system, as well as removing access from previously inducted members (ok, so that last part is probably unnecessary, as I don't think we've ever needed to do that).

[dpslwk]

Actually ability for maintainers to remove access would be good, some one abuses a tool they loose access and need to have a refresher induction.

'RepRap' Matt

On 2 Nov 2015, at 08:47, D [email protected] wrote:

I think this is a very good idea. It might also be nice to allow maintainers/admins to promote inducted members to inductor and/or maintainer in the system, as well as removing access from previously inducted members (ok, so that last part is probably unnecessary, as I don't think we've ever needed to do that).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[alex-wells]

The un-induct feature sounds like a good idea to me; I'm quite happy to pick this up once I've finished with the rest of bouncer, if no-one has any problems with me doing so?

[geeksareforlife]

Sounds good, but it should be maintainers (not inductors) that can un-induct

[alex-wells]

do we want to include trustees/membership admins in the list of those able to do the un-induct?

[geeksareforlife]

This just shows up the issue we have with permissions as HMS gets bigger

It might be better to deal with that issue first, before we add the promote/un-induct parts of this

[daniel1111]

I'd say probably not membership admin's but maybe those in the 'full access' group should be able to? (if not limited to just maintainers)

[dpslwk]

yeah full access, and leave the rest till we sort ACL out

‘RepRap’ Matt

On 2 Nov 2015, at 10:20, D [email protected] wrote:

I'd say probably not membership admin's but maybe those in the 'full access' group should be able to? (if not limited to just maintainers)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #110 (comment).

[daniel1111]

But yes - what @geeksareforlife said: permissions in HMS aren't that great atm