-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Assign detailed schedules using the lookup #1166
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This PR has identified a bug in how OS-HPXML calculates detailed utility bills for homes with modeled batteries. The fix is here: NREL/OpenStudio-HPXML#1555. |
Seems unlikely that you could ever use a single schedule across all buildings in the housing stock. Maybe it should be like detailed utility rates, where you can point to files based on a specified parameter? |
Yeah, I thought about that too. I think the idea in using the options_lookup, is that the schedule could differ by option for a given parameter. That's essentially the same approach used for detailed utility rates, except that the mapping is pulled out into its own lookup so as to support multiple scenarios. |
True, I guess you can always create a new TSV parameter for use in options_lookup to ensure you apply the desired schedule to a given building. |
Now that NREL/OpenStudio-HPXML#1555 has been merged, we can think about how to support assigning detailed schedules to dwelling units in the housing stock. Ideas we have so far:
|
Pull Request Description
Adds ResStockArguments arguments:
heating_setpoint_schedule
cooling_setpoint_schedule
water_heater_setpoint_schedule
battery_schedule
Update ResStockArguments measure to populate
schedules_filepaths
based on the contents of these new arguments. Update an arbitrary Battery option to assignbattery_schedule
. Only the testing project samples battery options.Checklist
Not all may apply:
openstudio tasks.rb update_measures
has been run