You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have issues with using moduleAnalysis() and sensorsx on my cell-level module. I have a module with 10 cells along the x-direction, and want to position one sensor on each of the cells. I have been using sensorsx = 10, but the position of the sensors does not seem to line up with the cells across the x-direction of the cell-level module. The spacing between each sensor position is slightly too short, and makes the 10 sensors sample cell number 1 to 8 in x-direction, hitting some of the cells multiple times or the gaps between the cells. Is there a way to slightly increase the spacing between each sensor in x-direction in order to make the sensors match up with the cells better?
This functionality in y-direction seems to work just fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, for the x direction it just does standard module length divided by the number of sensors + 1. We will not change this feature in the short term, so what I would suggest is increasing the sampling points and cleaning down the results. Marking this as a wishlist enhacement for the next release.
I have issues with using moduleAnalysis() and sensorsx on my cell-level module. I have a module with 10 cells along the x-direction, and want to position one sensor on each of the cells. I have been using sensorsx = 10, but the position of the sensors does not seem to line up with the cells across the x-direction of the cell-level module. The spacing between each sensor position is slightly too short, and makes the 10 sensors sample cell number 1 to 8 in x-direction, hitting some of the cells multiple times or the gaps between the cells. Is there a way to slightly increase the spacing between each sensor in x-direction in order to make the sensors match up with the cells better?
This functionality in y-direction seems to work just fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: