Note: contributing implies licensing those contributions under the terms of COPYING, which is an MIT-like license.
- Make sure you have a GitHub account
- Make sure there is no open issue on the topic
- Submit a new issue by choosing the kind of topic and fill out the template
Read the "Submitting changes" section of the nixpkgs manual. It explains how to write, test, and iterate on your change, and which branch to base your pull request against.
Below is a short excerpt of some points in there:
-
Format the commit messages in the following way:
(pkg-name | nixos/<module>): (from -> to | init at version | refactor | etc) (Motivation for change. Link to release notes. Additional information.)
For consistency, there should not be a period at the end of the commit message's summary line (the first line of the commit message).
Examples:
-
nginx: init at 2.0.1
-
firefox: 54.0.1 -> 55.0 https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/55.0/releasenotes/
-
nixos/hydra: add bazBaz option
Dual baz behavior is needed to do foo.
-
nixos/nginx: refactor config generation
The old config generation system used impure shell scripts and could break in specific circumstances (see #1234).
-
-
meta.description
should:- Be capitalized.
- Not start with the package name.
- Not have a period at the end.
-
meta.license
must be set and fit the upstream license.- If there is no upstream license,
meta.license
should default tolib.licenses.unfree
.
- If there is no upstream license,
-
meta.maintainers
must be set.
See the nixpkgs manual for more details on standard meta-attributes.
In addition to writing properly formatted commit messages, it's important to include relevant information so other developers can later understand why a change was made. While this information usually can be found by digging code, mailing list/Discourse archives, pull request discussions or upstream changes, it may require a lot of work.
For package version upgrades and such a one-line commit message is usually sufficient.
From time to time, changes between branches must be rebased, for example, if the number of new rebuilds they would cause is too large for the target branch. When rebasing, care must be taken to include only the intended changes, otherwise many CODEOWNERS will be inadvertently requested for review. To achieve this, rebasing should not be performed directly on the target branch, but on the merge base between the current and target branch.
In the following example, we see a rebase from master
onto the merge base
between master
and staging
, so that a change can eventually be retargeted to
staging
. The example uses upstream
as the remote for NixOS/nixpkgs.git
while the origin
remote is used for the remote you are pushing to.
# Find the common base between two branches
common=$(git merge-base upstream/master upstream/staging)
# Find the common base between your feature branch and master
commits=$(git merge-base $(git branch --show-current) upstream/master)
# Rebase all commits onto the common base
git rebase --onto=$common $commits
# Force push your changes
git push origin $(git branch --show-current) --force-with-lease
Then change the base branch in the GitHub PR using the Edit button in the upper
right corner, and switch from master
to staging
. After the PR has been
retargeted it might be necessary to do a final rebase onto the target branch, to
resolve any outstanding merge conflicts.
# Rebase onto target branch
git rebase upstream/staging
# Review and fixup possible conflicts
git status
# Force push your changes
git push origin $(git branch --show-current) --force-with-lease
Follow these steps to backport a change into a release branch in compliance with the commit policy.
- Take note of the commits in which the change was introduced into
master
branch. - Check out the target release branch, e.g.
release-21.11
. Do not use a channel branch likenixos-21.11
ornixpkgs-21.11-darwin
. - Create a branch for your change, e.g.
git checkout -b backport
. - When the reason to backport is not obvious from the original commit message, use
git cherry-pick -xe <original commit>
and add a reason. Otherwise usegit cherry-pick -x <original commit>
. That's fine for minor version updates that only include security and bug fixes, commits that fixes an otherwise broken package or similar. Please also ensure the commits exists on the master branch; in the case of squashed or rebased merges, the commit hash will change and the new commits can be found in the merge message at the bottom of the master pull request. - Push to GitHub and open a backport pull request. Make sure to select the release branch (e.g.
release-21.11
) as the target branch of the pull request, and link to the pull request in which the original change was comitted tomaster
. The pull request title should be the commit title with the release version as prefix, e.g.[21.11]
. - When the backport pull request is merged and you have the necessary privileges you can also replace the label
9.needs: port to stable
with8.has: port to stable
on the original pull request. This way maintainers can keep track of missing backports easier.
Anything that does not cause user or downstream dependency regressions can be backported. This includes:
- New Packages / Modules
- Security / Patch updates
- Version updates which include new functionality (but no breaking changes)
- Services which require a client to be up-to-date regardless. (E.g.
spotify
,steam
, ordiscord
) - Security critical applications (E.g.
firefox
)
(This section also applies to backporting 21.11 release notes: substitute "rl-2205" for "rl-2111".)
Documentation in nixpkgs is transitioning to a markdown-centric workflow. Release notes now require a translation step to convert from markdown to a compatible docbook document.
Steps for updating 22.05 Release notes:
- Edit
nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2205.section.md
with the desired changes - Run
./nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh
to rendernixos/doc/manual/from_md/release-notes/rl-2205.section.xml
- Include changes to
rl-2205.section.md
andrl-2205.section.xml
in the same commit.
See the nixpkgs manual for more details on how to Review contributions.