Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Local sphinx-build of doc pages show new logo, but online version does not #59

Open
Jwely opened this issue Aug 18, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@Jwely
Copy link
Member

Jwely commented Aug 18, 2015

The website fails to display the same way it does after a local build, though Travis-CI shows a completed update.

What it should look like
local_build

What it does look like

@Syntaf
Copy link
Member

Syntaf commented Aug 18, 2015

Are you sure this is an issue with travis? I just built the docs on the master branch and don't see the logo as well, is there something you haven't committed or such on your machine?

@Jwely
Copy link
Member Author

Jwely commented Aug 18, 2015

here it is on the master branch in source
and here on the gh-pages branch in build

If it isn't showing in your local build either, then the problem isn't likely with travis.

@Syntaf
Copy link
Member

Syntaf commented Aug 18, 2015

can you type git diff origin master in a console when at your repo and see if your local clone differs at all?

EDIT: what browser are you on? I built and tested on both IE and Chrome but don't see a logo

@Jwely
Copy link
Member Author

Jwely commented Aug 18, 2015

git diff origin master yields zero differences.

firefox, ie and chrome yield the same results. Complete removal of existing html build files prior to rebuilding with sphinx also seems to have no effect. There is not detectable difference in the source, but the html code in gh pages is clearly different than what is being produced on my local machine. Im not sure what setting is contributing to this.

I assumed it would be trivially easy to use a standard logo to brand all the NASA-DEVELOP repos, and would be nice, but this is not an important issue to solve.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants