You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(PROBABLY WRONG) if x is specialization of y,
then x inductively supports y
The above rule is probably wrong because inductive support requires more than specialization. A mere specialization may have nothing special about it and thus fail to support the concept that it specializes.
The situation is complex though. A given specialization in itself may not be significant. However, that specialization may contribute to a class of specializations to be interesting (because of its size, the nature of the instances that it contains, or else).
A similar issue arises concerning the following rule:
(PROBABLY WRONG) if x is a y,
then x inductively supports y
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Check the following rule:
(PROBABLY WRONG) if x is specialization of y,
then x inductively supports y
The above rule is probably wrong because inductive support requires more than specialization. A mere specialization may have nothing special about it and thus fail to support the concept that it specializes.
The situation is complex though. A given specialization in itself may not be significant. However, that specialization may contribute to a class of specializations to be interesting (because of its size, the nature of the instances that it contains, or else).
A similar issue arises concerning the following rule:
(PROBABLY WRONG) if x is a y,
then x inductively supports y
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: