Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check datalog rules /3 #56

Open
Mttbnchtt opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Check datalog rules /3 #56

Mttbnchtt opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Mttbnchtt
Copy link
Owner

Mttbnchtt commented Jan 5, 2024

Check the following rule:

(PROBABLY WRONG) if x is specialization of y,
then x inductively supports y

The above rule is probably wrong because inductive support requires more than specialization. A mere specialization may have nothing special about it and thus fail to support the concept that it specializes.

The situation is complex though. A given specialization in itself may not be significant. However, that specialization may contribute to a class of specializations to be interesting (because of its size, the nature of the instances that it contains, or else).

A similar issue arises concerning the following rule:
(PROBABLY WRONG) if x is a y,
then x inductively supports y

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant