We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why you decided to have
binding.remote_pry as method to call debugger
binding.remote_pry
and pry-remote to connect to it from shell
pry-remote
instead of have remote_pry as shell command?
remote_pry
What is more important that consistency?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this drives me nuts too :)
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Arnold Roa [email protected] wrote:
Why you decided to have binding.remote_pry as method to call debugger and pry-remote to connect to it from shell instead of have remote_pry as shell command? What is more important that consistency? — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #65.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #65.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Why you decided to have
binding.remote_pry
as method to call debuggerand
pry-remote
to connect to it from shellinstead of have
remote_pry
as shell command?What is more important that consistency?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: