Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

client cannot connect to pry-remote #11

Open
wzin opened this issue Jan 5, 2012 · 7 comments
Open

client cannot connect to pry-remote #11

wzin opened this issue Jan 5, 2012 · 7 comments

Comments

@wzin
Copy link

wzin commented Jan 5, 2012

Server side :
[pry-remote] Waiting for client on druby://0.0.0.0:9876

Client side :

pry-remote --host server_addr.com -p 9876 -c -w

Server side then crashes with :

/home/app/shared/bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/pry-remote-0.1.0/lib/pry-remote.rb:167:in remote_pry': $stderr must have write method, NilClass given (Typ eError) from pry_remote.rb:5:ininitialize'
from pry_remote.rb:9:in new' from pry_remote.rb:9 from /home/app/shared/bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.10/lib/rails/commands.rb:39:ineval'
from /home/app/shared/bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.10/lib/rails/commands/runner.rb:48
from /home/app/shared/bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.10/lib/rails/commands.rb:39:in require' from /home/app/shared/bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.10/lib/rails/commands.rb:39 from script/rails:6:inrequire'
from script/rails:6

@jjbeach
Copy link

jjbeach commented Aug 20, 2012

same here :(

@bonds
Copy link

bonds commented Sep 17, 2012

same here

@millisami
Copy link

+1 me too

@rsgrafx
Copy link

rsgrafx commented Feb 11, 2013

+1 me too.

@oshlykov
Copy link

hostname not resolve

@Wolfer
Copy link

Wolfer commented Jun 18, 2013

oshlykov meant that server-side must be able to correct resolve client's hostname.

@JoseAlban
Copy link

+1 "$stderr must have write method, NilClass given", version 0.1.8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants