Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

6-21G parameters of Neon is different from the papar #255

Open
inoueta opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

6-21G parameters of Neon is different from the papar #255

inoueta opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@inoueta
Copy link

inoueta commented Aug 22, 2022

I noticed that 6-21G parameter of Neon at 1S function is different from ones given in the original paper.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja00523a008

With the BSE parameter, Ne atom is less bound significantly i.e. 0.8 Hartree.
What is the origin of this discrepancy?

@bennybp
Copy link
Member

bennybp commented Aug 31, 2022

I dug into this a little bit and I think you are correct. The discrepancy comes from Gaussian.

Those are the exponents/coefficients for Na, which Gaussian seems to use if you select Ne. Let me see what GAMESS has as well.

@bennybp bennybp added the data label Aug 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants