Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

confused about the training input range #11

Open
zxcvads opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

confused about the training input range #11

zxcvads opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@zxcvads
Copy link

zxcvads commented Apr 26, 2022

hi ,i have a question about the input dataset range ,i have see your paper released model input range is(0,256),if i change the input range to(-1,1) or (0,1),i am confused about the PSNR change ,can you have a try in different training data range ?

@bigeagle
Copy link
Contributor

It's not substantial. Some hyper parameters (such as learning rate) may need to be tuned according to data range.

@bigeagle
Copy link
Contributor

bigeagle commented May 3, 2022

No specific reason. Some legacy code use (0, 256).
Using (0, 1) is OK and can reach the comparable PSNR.

@zxcvads zxcvads changed the title confused about if i modify the training input range from (0,256) to (-1,1),the accuracy will change? confused about the training input range May 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants