Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial code of the caching repository #17

Merged
merged 704 commits into from
Jun 22, 2021
Merged

Conversation

eileen-kuehn
Copy link
Member

@eileen-kuehn eileen-kuehn commented Dec 9, 2020

This PR adds the initial code from @tfesenbecker.
Current state of documentation can be found in a hidden build of readthedocs.

Closes #11, closes #15, closes #19, closes #22.
Also closes #8.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 27, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@423f9ae). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #17   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   79.24%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       33           
  Lines             ?     1797           
  Branches          ?      195           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     1424           
  Misses            ?      316           
  Partials          ?       57           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 423f9ae...cc9f45f. Read the comment docs.

* [CLI] Implement CLI-extension for caching

* [Project] Configuring CLI simulate script installer

* [CLI] Enable multiple storage_files

* [CLI] Simplify by getting rid of subcommands

Co-authored-by: Eileen Kuehn <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Fischer <[email protected]>
@eileen-kuehn
Copy link
Member Author

@maxfischer2781, this is slowly getting really huge... I will mark it as Ready for review so that we can work through the first lines 😸

@eileen-kuehn eileen-kuehn marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2021 20:33
maxfischer2781
maxfischer2781 previously approved these changes Jun 21, 2021
Copy link
Member

@maxfischer2781 maxfischer2781 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Honestly, I didn't check every line. But it looks generally good to me, tests are passing (locally, travis seems to be dead) and there's some good work in it.

So, let's go for it – if we've missed anything, we can fix it later on.

@eileen-kuehn eileen-kuehn merged commit 8f4f614 into master Jun 22, 2021
@eileen-kuehn eileen-kuehn deleted the add/initial-code branch June 22, 2021 07:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants