Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Item Object Display Enhancements #93

Open
1 of 4 tasks
vijayiyer05 opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks

Consider Item Object Display Enhancements #93

vijayiyer05 opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@vijayiyer05
Copy link
Collaborator

vijayiyer05 commented Apr 12, 2021

  • Stimulus template variable ordering
  • Consider linked file direct/derived property group separation
  • Consider general rules for including some item information among core properties (e.g. the "least unique" item info values or the "fully redundant" values stored in info table properties)
  • Consider to add a show methods link to item object custom display footer (where there are available public methods)
@vijayiyer05
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Completed first item as of 0f12193.

Defer additional items to future release.

@vijayiyer05 vijayiyer05 changed the title Finishing items (v0.9) Consider Item Object Display Enhancements May 9, 2021
@DylanMuir DylanMuir added this to the SOW_M2 milestone Jul 5, 2021
@vijayiyer05
Copy link
Collaborator Author

One idea that came out of the summer project might be that it may make more sense to group the properties after LinkedItems by "physiology", "behavior", and "metadata" matching groups defined by the data resource, rather than the current grouping (direct, derived, linked file 1 direct/derived, linked file 2 direct/derived, etc...).

As noted in earlier comment: I suggest deferring remainder of this Issue to future cycle. Just capturing ideas for now.

@vijayiyer05 vijayiyer05 removed this from the SOW_M2 milestone Aug 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants