-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thermal Performance Tests #42
Comments
@martinjaeger I performed an 80 A test without the heatsink using the latest hardware. Test Setup:Libre Solar BMS C1 v0.4.1 (03/2024) Boundary Conditions:Ambient Temperature: ~21°C Test Scenario 80 A without heatsink
Below graph shows the current profile, temperature rise of the internal sensors and thermal camera temperature areas over time. Test Scenario 100 A without heatsink
Below graph shows the current profile, temperature rise of the internal sensors and thermal camera temperature areas over time. |
Nice, thanks for posting the test results! |
I added the 100 A test without a heatsink to the post. I believe 80 A without a heatsink is acceptable at temperatures below 60 °C, but 100 A without one is not recommended because it reaches nearly 90 °C. |
Thanks. Even more interesting, as it can be compared to the same test with previous hardware. It looks like the new 80V-rated MOSFETs didn't make a huge difference compared to the previous 100V-rated ones. Only 4 K colder, but the ambient temperature was also 3 K lower. |
Introduction:
Our aim was to conduct a thermal investigation of the BMS to determine how hot it gets at a current of 100 A or more.
Test Setup:
The picture below illustrates the BMS setup during the testing phase (with heatsink). The tests were performed without actual battery, as described here.
Used Devices:
Boundary Conditions:
Test Scenarios:
Three different scenarios were tested:
Without Heatsink:
With Heatsink (1):
With Heatsink (2):
Conclusion
The BMS can comfortably manage over 100 A while maintaining a temperature within an acceptable range.
If feasible, the PCB layer should have a thickness greater than 70 µm to minimize the heating around the shunt.
Further work could involve identifying the maximum current that results in a temperature of around 80°C.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: