You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The creepage distance for the battery voltage is only 0.3mm to GND.
To reduce the risk of arcing, it makes sense to increase the distance to at least 0.7mm in respect to IPC9592.
On the connector this requires a change of the pinning to achieve the increased distance.
example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Swapped the pins and increased the GND plane gap on top layer from 0.3 mm to 0.5 mm:
You suggested 0.7 mm, which would make quite a few GND planes on the top layer disappear. I'm wondering if 0.7 mm is only required for dirty / moisty environment, as it is violated by the IC anyways:
PDSG pin is pulled up to the battery voltage during normal operation and it's right next to a GND pin:
probably it is more critical in dirty/moisty environments, but as far as I know the standard is always valid.
I think on the IC it is not that big problem. As the signals have high impedance, arcing will not have a big impact.
On the high power traces it is much more important as arcing then causes fire.
The creepage distance for the battery voltage is only 0.3mm to GND.
To reduce the risk of arcing, it makes sense to increase the distance to at least 0.7mm in respect to IPC9592.
On the connector this requires a change of the pinning to achieve the increased distance.
example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: