-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fast and faster R-CNN #35
Comments
It's been on my list to try but I probably won't get to it anytime soon. A PR would certainly be welcome! |
Has anyone written an implementation of one of these in Lasagne yet? Just wondering, since I might have to implement one of these later on this year for a project. It would be nice to know if this has already been done, to save me some work. |
I have an implementation of Fast RCNN in Lasagne over VGG16 model. I am not sure if my implementation is correct. |
Thanks very much @Sentient07 :) Is there any possibility of seeing this as a Lasagne recipe at some point in the future? |
Theano is at the moment focused on a release. Until then, I don't think my PR would get merged there. Once it's merged, I'll open a PR on lasagne, then Lasagne recipe :) would take a month's time approximately. |
There is a small detail that I missed to mention in my previous comment. On certain GPUs, you have to use the flag |
If I have some time, I'll be happy to look at the implementation too, but I think it's worth me re-reading Fast-RCNN again before I look at any code! |
That'd be welcome! I'm afraid I won't be able to check the implementation in the near future. If you're able to reproduce results from the paper, that's a good indicator that you've got the basics correct :) |
Hi Jan,
This implementation is the variant of the original one which I had
described about in the ROIPool PR's thread on theano. I am training on the
VOC 2012 right now. How many epoch should I run? Is it fine if I compare
the results with Caffe implementation at some smaller epoch or should I
train it completely and compare the results ?
Ramana
…On Mar 16, 2017 19:55, "Jan Schlüter" ***@***.***> wrote:
If I have some time, I'll be happy to look at the implementation too
That'd be welcome! I'm afraid I won't be able to check the implementation
in the near future. If you're able to reproduce results from the paper,
that's a good indicator that you've got the basics correct :)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#35 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF6IcHAWrpLzW7IHh1zOmmdlwYkFYm8_ks5rmUZPgaJpZM4G22DS>
.
|
If you can afford to run it long enough to compare/reproduce the final results, that'd probably be better. But you might want to compare to Caffe in between (to make sure your implementation is not way off). If full training is not feasible, a stripped-down demo that shows it's doing something useful would also be fine for a Lasagne Recipe. |
Is it worth implementing the fast R-CNN and faster R-CNN with Lasagne? Both are state-of-the-art image detection methods.
My current guess is faster R-CNN is easier since it purely relies on two networks (one for proposal, another for detection) and would like to work on it. Anyone has tried that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: