-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
Maintenance phase #329
Comments
Are there any good ORM alternatives you suggest for Typescript? |
There are alternatives, but I haven't used any of them so I don't have opinion on them. Just to name a few alternatives(alphabetical order):
|
A pity but I'm completely agree with your motivation. |
I think Prisma is the best choice (now). |
Do you have any issue #'s for some of these bugs? |
I don't keep a list. Results of a quick search(I recall some of them, not all):
|
@Kononnable - Just wanted to share with you that running your npx command for MySQL just saved me countless hours. I was about to build this same thing out manually and found your repo. Ran the npx command and first try it generated exactly what I needed like magic. Just wanted to share my appreciation. Keep up the good work, this is an incredible tool. |
What is your opinion on Sequelize? |
couldn't agree more! |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Well, I would consider using TypeORM instead of Sequelize any day, but I do have to admit that it could become the next Sequelize. TypeORM has almost the same amount of stars on GitHub as Sequelize, but also, almost the same amount of issues, which I find concerning. I've had way less issues with TypeORM though, and it seems to be more active than Sequelize. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
For OracleDB there are not so many choices. With the already released 0.3 version, would you reconsider @Kononnable ? |
This is a nice project and can be adapted to be used with any other ORM. Actually I forked it back in the days to generate models for Bookshelf. |
ur cool |
typeorm-model-generator is entering maintenance phase
What does that mean?
I(@Kononnable ) am not planning to add any more features to typeorm-model-generator. Some minor changes proposed in PRs might get merged, but any complex feature will get rejected. I'll try to check issues/PRs from time to time, but truth be told this project isn't currently my main priority.
I think typeorm-model-generator is in a pretty good state, there are some quirks and bugs, but it's mostly easy to go around them. Basic features(common features for this kind of software) are there, if anyone needs more complex ones they can easily implement them on their own(in a non generic way, customized to theirs build environment - USECASES).
Why?
I don't think typeorm should be considered as option for new projects other than prof of concepts or some workshop exercises. Typeorm is in a bad place. It's been like that for few years and I don't believe this will change any time soon(if ever). There are even some long standing bugs which can result in data loss. Some of the fixes are blocked by inability to introduce breaking changes - next branch(planned 0.3.0 version) has been with us for 3 years now and yet there are no concrete plans on releasing it or throwing that code away.
I've decided to mark this project as maintenance only to make sure that any newcomers think twice before choosing typeorm for their ORM.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: