From 11b1a4772dc0017a630907905c96d6bd2443bc4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thibault Charbonnier <thibaultcha@me.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 08:22:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] chore(ci) restore Codecov support alongside Coveralls

Codecov has a couple features that Coveralls lacks: better PR comments
and PR diff comments of uncovered lines. It's also easier to maintain
compared to the `carryforward` flags of Coveralls.
---
 .github/workflows/job-unit-tests.yml |  5 +++++
 codecov.yml                          | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 codecov.yml

diff --git a/.github/workflows/job-unit-tests.yml b/.github/workflows/job-unit-tests.yml
index b77f41d6b..c056c5524 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/job-unit-tests.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/job-unit-tests.yml
@@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ jobs:
           flag-name: ${{ steps.lcov.outputs.name }}
           path-to-lcov: './lcov.info'
           parallel: true
+      - name: Codecov Upload
+        if: ${{ !env.ACT && inputs.cc == 'gcc-9' && inputs.coverage }}
+        uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
+        with:
+          files: './lcov.info'
       - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v2
         if: ${{ failure() && !env.ACT }}
         with:
diff --git a/codecov.yml b/codecov.yml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..07eb8f3e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/codecov.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecovyml-reference
+codecov:
+  require_ci_to_pass: yes
+  notify:
+    wait_for_ci: yes
+    after_n_builds: 9
+
+coverage:
+  precision: 4
+  round: down
+  range: "75...100"
+  status:
+    project:
+      default:
+        target: auto
+        threshold: 3%
+        base: auto
+        flags:
+          - unit
+        paths:
+          - src
+
+comment:
+  layout: "reach, diff, files"
+  behavior: default
+  require_changes: false
+  require_base: no
+  require_head: yes