Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Text file interpretation into various datatypes should be improved #205

Open
curtislisle opened this issue Aug 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@curtislisle
Copy link
Collaborator

Text files should have better default interpretations if this is possible. It is suggested to interpret as TSV or CSV initially

@jeffbaumes
Copy link
Member

By this do you mean the handling of text files that have no registered extension (or no extension)?

@curtislisle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I was actually referring to the default inference types of xxxx.txt files. This is a placeholder to remember that Luke has had trouble with text files being misinterpreted when the desired behavior would have been to interpret it as TSV.

I like the dialog that pops up asking for type clarification. Could we add TSV and CSV and option types, please?

On Aug 16, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Jeffrey Baumes [email protected] wrote:

By this do you mean the handling of text files that have no registered extension (or no extension)?


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #205 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACDZ9mnDvopKBpymtopaLJ1a8XBubXI5ks5qgfGkgaJpZM4Jlpb9.

@jeffbaumes
Copy link
Member

I believe all delimited files are lumped under CSV and the separator (including tab) is auto-detected. This could just be a matter of adding txt to the list of extensions for CSV in Girder Worker. @danlamanna can you confirm and implement the change?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants