-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature suggestion] 'Search secrets' #823
Comments
My only concern is adding yet another tab, otherwise it looks good! I think there should be a menu File -> Secrets or something, and it would then populate the search pane with what you're suggesting above. Or maybe a dialog. My question is are there scenarios where we don't want everything enabled? @nguerrera FYI if you haven't met @JanKrivanek he's on the MSBuild team and also passionate about redacting secrets among many other things. |
or for starters we could keep it simple and add search keywords such as $secret $token $aws and whatnot. It would work well as an
|
I like the ideas to simplify this - especially with search term. As for ability to not use some - it's mainly about perf an false positives. That being said for 'highly identifiable' patterns - we probably almost allways want all. For heuristics - it might depend. |
perhaps split the results into high confidence and low confidence all the results should appear in the results tree like all other results, including files and file names |
Motivation
People are sometimes cautious about whether they can share their binlogs (rightfully)! They can reduct some secrets today (the set of patterns ideally to be expanded as part of this), but they cannot simply check if there is something to be worried about.
I'd want to add something for just searching secrets - but want to first drag it through discussion before spending time on it.
UX Proposal
Just a very rough idea :-) I want to collect feedback on what to avoid and what to try when trying to play with possible ux implementations.
Possible future iterations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: