Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up Old Files / Improve Models #143

Open
pap1723 opened this issue Jun 30, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Clean up Old Files / Improve Models #143

pap1723 opened this issue Jun 30, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@pap1723
Copy link
Collaborator

pap1723 commented Jun 30, 2021

Part of the goal is to move away from SSTU to the higher fidelity models that might exist from BDB and elsewhere. Here is a list of which parts still use SSTU models.

  • ROE-Agena8048
  • ROE-AJ10-transtar (AJ-190)
  • ROE-J2
  • ROE-J2X
  • All of the Merlins
  • RD-107
  • RD-108
  • RD-0110
  • RD-170
  • RD-191
  • ROE-RL10A3
  • ROE-RL10A5
  • ROE-RL10B2
  • ROE-RS25

I don't know what options exist, just wanted to get these listed out.

@al2me6
Copy link
Member

al2me6 commented Jul 1, 2021

Models that I know of:

Another notably bad model is the Raptor, which looks nothing like the actual engine. Unfortunately the only good model I'm aware of is in NF Launch Vehicles Cryo Engines :/

@vader111
Copy link
Contributor

vader111 commented Jul 1, 2021

Well we could always config the engines to use models from pack we cannot take assets from the same way ROTanks & ROSolar uses the near future stuff as a temp solution

@Capkirk123
Copy link
Member

#178 Addresses the remaining Russian engines (RD-107/108/0110/170/191)
CryoEngines has a J-2X, but we cannot use Nertea's models as mentioned above. Same for Raptor.
To the best of my knowledge no model exists of transtar, it's fairly obscure
There are a few Merlin models out there, but not many are better than the SSTU ones, and none of them encompass all Merlin versions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants