We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Position
https://github.com/Juniper/terraform-provider-apstra/blob/ffca27533382aff6c48229444fb61f560e0601f4/apstra/resource_interface_map.go#L548C1-L549C1
I think we're using the physical port ID here, but should be using a value which represents the logical device port.
Example weirdness:
resource "apstra_interface_map" "100x128" { name = "qfx5220-32cd--128x100" device_profile_id = "Juniper_QFX5220-32CD_Junos" logical_device_id = "AOS-128x100-1" interfaces = [for i in range(128) : { logical_device_port = format("1/%d", i + 1) physical_interface_name = format("et-0/0/%d:%d", floor(i / 4), i % 4) transformation_id = 2 } ] }
I think this issue manifests itself as a cosmetic flaw in the web UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
https://github.com/Juniper/terraform-provider-apstra/blob/ffca27533382aff6c48229444fb61f560e0601f4/apstra/resource_interface_map.go#L548C1-L549C1
I think we're using the physical port ID here, but should be using a value which represents the logical device port.
Example weirdness:
I think this issue manifests itself as a cosmetic flaw in the web UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: