You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It might sometimes be useful for embedded manifolds to work in the embedding and consider the level set function $h(\iota(p)) = 0$, where $\iota(p)$ is the embed function. This is closely related to submersions.
For both the derivative would be useful, for example to constrain $\text{Ker} Dh(p) = 0$ in the embedding, when trying to find a tangent vector (using constraints).
What would be the best way to name these (cf. a first idea also at #734)
$h$ could be level_set(M,q) for any q from the embedding of M?
$Dh$ would need a nice name
submersions would probably need two manifolds (Domain and range)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It might sometimes be useful for embedded manifolds to work in the embedding and consider the level set function$h(\iota(p)) = 0$ , where $\iota(p)$ is the $\text{Ker} Dh(p) = 0$ in the embedding, when trying to find a tangent vector (using constraints).
embed
function. This is closely related to submersions.For both the derivative would be useful, for example to constrain
What would be the best way to name these (cf. a first idea also at #734)
level_set(M,q)
for anyq
from the embedding ofM
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: