We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There is a nice benchmark of 100 Pythia 8 events that @grasph generated that we use for correctness and benchmarking ATM.
I would propose that we extend this to two additional use cases:
In both cases FastJet should be used as a reference to ensure correctness.
We should also test other clustering strategies, at least Cambridge/Achen ($p=0$) and Inclusive $k_T$ ($p=1$).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This was fixed in 47182d9. All 3 main algorithms are tested, as well as different input types: PseudoJet and LorentzVector.
PseudoJet
LorentzVector
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
There is a nice benchmark of 100 Pythia 8 events that @grasph generated that we use for correctness and benchmarking ATM.
I would propose that we extend this to two additional use cases:
In both cases FastJet should be used as a reference to ensure correctness.
We should also test other clustering strategies, at least Cambridge/Achen ($p=0$ ) and Inclusive $k_T$ ($p=1$ ).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: